Answer:
B. virtually ignores aspects of cognitive that are NOT linear.
Explanation:
A major weakness of the information-processing perspective is that it virtually ignores aspects of cognitive that are not linear and logical.
It is worthy of note to know the meaning/ definition of information processing.
Information processing can be described as situation whereby information are processed, typically by an organism of a computer system inorder to derived or yield new or more useful information.
The appropriate response is the National Organization for Women. It is the biggest association of women's activist grassroots activists in the United States. Presently has several sections and countless individuals and activists in every one of the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The next step that Vanessa would have to take is to sign a DoD Statement of Understanding and provide it to her APC.
Explanation:
- Every single event in the programs run by the Department of Defense of the United States is intelligently planned and capable of carrying out required verification at every single stage of the program.
- In the given example, the agency program coordinator requires Vanessa to sign and submit with him the statement issued by the Department of Defense before letting Vanessa have her travel card.
- The submission of the signed statement with the APC thus formulates the last step of the procedure of securing a travel card issued by the DoD.
There are a few ways that this can be done. I will list the ones I know off the top of my head, as this is a broad question. I will be describing this as if the reader is a political scientist so don't take it personally, it's just so you can better understand.
Cherry Picking: Say you want to get a poll. Don't go to an area where there is a majority of the working class. You wan't to go to areas that are high on welfare, stock brokers, corporate etc. You can best find these in big cities like New York, Orlando, so on. That way, when people see the polls, they will look at what are demographic is, giving them the sense that we are popular party.
Fabrication: Don't worry about the legitimacy. Most people just want some sort of facts or explanation, and if we make one up that it is believable for most people, we are good. So long as they don't look at the actual ice caps and the temperature around the world, as far as they know Global Warming is a thing, *cough* I mean, sorry not Global Warming, Climate Change, it's totally different *wink, wink*.
Censorship: So long as no one sees any contradicting evidence to our polls, they are good. Same thing with Climate Change. If however something does come up we need to treat is as if it is absurd. Conspiracy theorist! But even then we need to make sure that it stays away from public eye, and public opinion.
Hope this helps, don't want to keep you waiting much longer.
The one that you shaded in is correct
