The measure of systematic risk is called <u>beta</u>.
The answer is option c.
Beta is the same old CAPM measure of systematic hazard. It gauges the tendency of the go back of protection to transport in parallel with the return of the inventory market as an entire. One manner to consider beta is as a gauge of a protection's volatility relative to the marketplace's volatility.
Systematic risk is a part of the total risk this is caused by factors beyond the control of a specific company or individual. Systematic risk is caused by elements that are outside to the organization. All investments or securities are situations to systematic hazard and, therefore, it's far a non-diversifiable chance.
To measure a monetary firm's contribution to systemic hazard includes measuring the company's expected capital shortfall in a crisis. This right away offers the regulator with a quantifiable degree of the relative significance of a firm's contribution to ordinary systemic chance.
Learn more about organization here: brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
Answer:
option (A) 10 percent
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Dividend yield = 3 percent
Expected growth rate = 7 percent
Therefore,
The ABC's required return will be
= Dividend yield + Expected growth rate
or
The ABC's required return = 3% + 7%
or
The ABC's required return = 10%
Hence,
The ABC's required return is option (A) 10 percent
Answer:
a.Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries.
A person has an absolute advantage in production if it produces more quantities of the good when compared with other countries.
Georgeland produces more quantities of both food and clothes when compared to Alland, so it has absolute advantage in both activities .
The opportunity cost of georgeland in producing clothes = 36 / 18=2
The opportunity cost of georgeland producing food = 18 / 36 = 0.5
For Alland,
the opportunity cost of producing clothes = 32 / 16= 2
the opportunity cost of producing food = 16 / 32 = 0.5
Neither countries don't have a comparative advantage in the production of either clothes of food bedside they have the same opportunity costs in both activities.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
much <em>more </em>likely;
There is only one car dealership in a small town, giving the dealership the ability to influence the price of cars. - <em>Market power</em>
A person smoking in a restaurant emits second-hand smoke that harms other restaurant patrons. - <em>Externality</em>
Explanation:
<u>Property rights</u> are an incentive for individuals to create goods that are needed on the market. In other words, when a discrepancy between demand and supply occurs on a specific market, entities, businesses or individuals that create the goods are motivated to meet market needs through enforced property rights.
On the other hand, when there is a lack of property rights that regulate the market, <em>market failures</em> occur. Two common types of market failures include <em>market power</em> and <em>externalities</em>.
The car dealership example shows <u>market power</u> in practice, as the reigning company can dictate car prices.
The second example shows an externality, as there is evident influence (cost or benefit) on the third party, which they cannot change. People are affected (negatively) by smoke they did not create.
Answer:
Explanation:
Depends on the sample size.
Lots of people, median
Few probably neither is very helpful, but I'll pick the mean.
You need a single word answer? I'll pick median.
