Clubs, fun, extravagant, surprising and and adventure. That’s if your in Miami
Answer:
Therefore, competitive strategy is essential for the survival of the product in the market. Having a new competitive strategy to beat rival companies or their products by renaming or redesigning their products will help the company to be more profitable and create an image new on the market.
Answer:
$1
Explanation:
The marginal cost refers to the cost of producing one additional unit or serving one more customer.
In this case, we have to determine the additional cost of Jacob ordering a burrito instead of a taco. As Mason chose the tacos and they agreed to split the lunch bill evenly, if Jacob decides to eat the tacos, the cost for each of them is:
$3+$3=$6/2= $3
If Jacob decides to eat the burrito:
$3+$5= $8/2= $4
So, the marginal cost to Jacob ordering a burrito is:
$4-$3= $1
Answer: The amount of gross margin Mazer would report if the company uses absorption costing is $1350.
Explanation:
Given that,
Mazer Manufacturing Company produced = 2,000 units of inventory
Units Sold = 1,800 units
Variable product cost = $4 per unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost = $2,500
Sales price of the products = $6 per unit
Fixed manufacturing cost per unit = 
= 
= $1.25 per unit
Unit Product cost under Absorption costing = Variable product cost + Fixed manufacturing cost per unit
= 4 + 1.25
= $5.25
∴ Gross margin under Absorption costing = Sales Revenue - Cost of goods sold
= Units sold × sales price - Units sold × Unit Product cost under Absorption costing
= 1800 × 6 - 1800 × 5.25
= 10800 - 9450
= $1350
Answer:
They should operate Mine 1 for 1 hour and Mine 2 for 3 hours to meet the contractual obligations and minimize cost.
Explanation:
The formulation of the linear programming is:
Objective function:

Restrictions:
- High-grade ore: 
- Medium-grade ore: 
- Low-grade ore: 
- No negative hours: 
We start graphing the restrictions in a M1-M2 plane.
In the figure attached, we have the feasible region, where all the restrictions are validated, and the four points of intersection of 2 restrictions.
In one of this four points lies the minimum cost.
Graphically, we can graph the cost function over this feasible region, with different cost levels. When the line cost intersects one of the four points with the lowest level of cost, this is the optimum combination.
(NOTE: it is best to start with a low guessing of the cost and going up until it reaches one point in the feasible region).
The solution is for the point (M1=1, M2=3), with a cost of C=$680.
The cost function graph is attached.