1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enyata [817]
3 years ago
14

It is illegal for your employer to let you get away with not wearing your respirator when required

History
2 answers:
mixas84 [53]3 years ago
7 0

yes i would  and you will get in tubule

Tresset [83]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The statement is true.

Explanation:

It is true because the employer is responsible for the health and protection during the labor time. So if he/she lets you get away with not wearing your respirator when required it would be a violation of the law and, not only would be a problem for the employer who could face fines. It could be a problem also for you because if something happened while you´re violating the norms the insurance may not accept to cover that accident.

I hope this answer helps you.

You might be interested in
Which Governmental organization best completes the title of the graphic?
Alekssandra [29.7K]
The correct answer is

A. The Supreme Court
3 0
3 years ago
VWhich of the following contributed to the outbreak of the Russian Revolution in 1917?
Luba_88 [7]

the answer to your question is a

7 0
3 years ago
What were the short- and long-term causes of the Stock Market Crash of 1929?
MArishka [77]

Answer:

Massive short term sell off stocks,market loses value. Banks had made too many bad loans to speculators in stock. Many lost their life savings.

pansion of credit. Household take loans, go into debt.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
2.The Pecos Pueblo developed as a trading center over time. What evidence in the text supports the idea that this took a long ti
Ivan
The answer is (1) because of its value as trading center ect
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a Supreme Court Justice disagrees with the decision of the court, he/she may write a. A. new law B. Letter to the president C
valentinak56 [21]
D because he/she can't change the majority opinion by making a new law or making a letter to the president etc... she can only write why she/he does not agree with the majority. 
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT PLEASE HELP Compare and contrast the treatment of Japanese Americans from Bainbridge Island to those from
    7·1 answer
  • What were two reasons for the rapid spread of slavery in the American colonies?
    12·2 answers
  • What important information does the setting in this excerpt communicate about the story?
    13·1 answer
  • What amendment kept certain powers for the states.
    14·1 answer
  • What words could you use to describe Stalin and his type of leadership
    10·1 answer
  • How do the elements of culture influence the American Revolution?
    13·1 answer
  • How did trouble in the Middle East affect the Nixon administration?
    13·1 answer
  • Who made up the patrician class? How is this different from Ancient Rome
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT considered to be a cause of the GreatDepression?
    10·2 answers
  • Chapter 1: Treats of the Place Where Oliver Twist was Born ...
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!