I think D is the best answer choice. for a work written around the time of the salem witch trials, you can better understand why extreme fear and condemnation of witchcraft might show up, and the author's purpose is a major thing to understand a work. C doesn't really make sense, because historical context is based on facts, so the context doesn't so much help you understand an author's attitude/opinion. B is true to some degree, but D is still a stronger answer as B is somewhat circular; historical context is an inherent part of a historical character? and A doesn't even make sense to me but i personally would go with D
Including fallacies in advertising can be effective but dangerous at the same time. For example, aspirins are advertised through telling people that if they feel tired when they get up in the morning, they should take an aspirin so that they can face the day. This may be effective because a lot of people work long hours and feel naturally tired. Besides, they turn on the TV when they get back home in the evening and see these sorts of commercials. They will believe in them since they will have to get up and go to work the following day. However, this may be dangerous because people can develop addiction to drugs.
In my opinion, we should not believe in advertisements. The fact that people feel tired because of their work is a real problem. We can feel identified with that problem but the solution cannot be an aspirin. The advertisement shows us the problem but the solution is dangerous; our health is affected. If our health is the problem, we should see our doctor. Doctors will give us true facts. As a result, we will become better consumers because we will take from the market what is really good for us and we will not believe just in anything. For example , we will just believe in advertisments that show the good effects of eating healthy food and doing exercises.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Although large-scale change is likely in many sectors education reform and a progressive BI Program will help us offset risk and protect social stability
Answer:
The government's neglect to send relief teams quickly.
Explanation:
Residents of the Areas most affected by the earthquakes claim that relief and rescue teams were dispatched after two to three days. In that period of time, the damage caused by the earthquakes worsened immensely, many people lost their lives, as they were not rescued in time, not to mention the secondary damage and the despair that this delay causes.
This delay by the government in acting and helping its people, allowed the natural disaster to take on unimaginable proportions and which continue today.
