Only that they both deposed an unpopular king. After that they differ....The British 'Glorious' was done without bloodshed or violence, and a new Queen (the deposed Kings daughter) was right away placed on throne as new leader, leading to peace and prosperity.
The French...was done with lots of violence, rioting and bloodshed including the execution of the deposed king, the queen and their children. The French never got around to placing a new king or leader on the murdered king's throne, so chaos was the result.
Aurangzeb--as a strict Sunni Muslim, he reversed religious toleration laws in place in the Mughal Empire.
Aurangzeb restricted both non-Muslims and Shi'a Muslims. He viewed anyone not a Sunni as a heretic. He reinstated taxes on non-Muslims and began ruling under Islamic law. Due to these changes Aurangzeb is viewed as a cruel and harsh Mughal leader.
Explanation:
Slavery in America during revolution
