1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna [14]
3 years ago
8

Joey has shot up in height over the past year, has developed a deeper voice and is starting to grow facial hair. He is preoccupi

ed with the pursuit of independence and identity and is spending more time with friends and less with family.
Which of the following periods of development is Joey in?

a) middle childhood
b) adolescence
c) early adulthood
d) late adulthood
Social Studies
1 answer:
andreyandreev [35.5K]3 years ago
3 0

a) This is because the other choices are either way too early or too late. Plus kids enter puberty around middle school.

You might be interested in
Without motivation, nothing would get done in this world.
iogann1982 [59]
True because for someone to do ‘something’ there’s a reason/purpose behind whey they’re doing it in the first place
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL GIVE 25 POINTS!!!!!
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Sanctuary Cities are abhorrent at best, and the reason is simple. One could back these ideas purely on principal, but instead the state and local governments that enact these sanctuary laws are doing so with only political motivation in mind. Much like every mass shooting, or every time something bad happens in our nation. The political dilemma we face is that these acts or carried out without pure intentions.

Pandering to a base by way of violating laws sets a terrible precedent going forward. it suggests that here our laws are different and "that line in the sand can move". what is a nation of laws which doesn't enforce them. The answer is a nation without a spine. A law is a law, and while one might disagree with the laws, and that is why we have a proper way of enacting changes we want to see done in our great nation.

This has been done with Marijuana in multiple states already, however cities and local governments do not hold a vote to allow residents to have a say. No, instead they declare the city as being a sanctuary, and depend on mob rule to force those who oppose into silence or to force them out of the city entirely.

If we want to make it easier for people to attain visas and green cards, let's have that discussion and vote on it. if we want to make the US open borders, let's have a discussion and vote on it. but to simply say "to hell with you" and violate the law of the land without the say so from the citizens of state and local municipalities is mob rule at best and a violation of the oathes of offices taken by those we elect into those offices.

Personally, I believe that it is too hard for immigrants to attain visas and green cards, and that isn't to mention the financial cost ranging in the thousands for a single person going through this process. I believe this system requires change and needs revision, but it is wrong to declare sanctuary cities and states. one because it is done with motivation of pandering to a base for political gain, and lastly it sets a precedent for lawlessness in our greater country and local and state governments.

If we are to be a nation of laws, then we must be a nation of laws and not lawlessness. If we are to be a nation of suggestions, then we should carry on as we are currently doing. I love to do what feels right, but it must be done in the right way, otherwise you add fuel to the fires of division in our nation, and as Abraham Lincoln once famously stated; "A divided house cannot stand".

5 0
3 years ago
If you can make your own state what would be the geographic distribution of power with your government?
shtirl [24]

Answer:In addition to the type, or form of government

that exists in a society, there are other factors

that play a role in the overall function of a

government, including the geographic

distribution of power, and the relationship

between the legislative and executive branch.

Geographic Distribution of Power

In every system of government the power to

govern is located in one or more places

geographically. From this standpoint, three

basic structures exist: unitary, federal, and

confederate.

Unitary Government

A unitary government is often described as a

centralized government. All powers held by the

government belong to a single, central agency.

The central (national) government creates local

units of government for its convenience. Those

local governments have only those powers that

the central government chooses to give them.

Most governments in the word are unitary in

form. Great Britain is a classic example. It has a

single central organization, the Parliament,

holding all of the government’s power. Local

governments exist solely to relieve Parliament

of the tasks that would be difficult or

burdensome to do. Though unlikely, Parliament

could get rid of those agencies of local

government at any time if it wanted to.

Be careful not to confuse a unitary government

with a dictatorship. In the unitary government

all forms of power are held by the central

government, but that government can still

elected by the people, and if so, would only

have the powers that the people allowed it to

have. So, a government could be both unitary

and democratic.

Federal Government

A federal government is one in which the

powers of government are divided between a

central government and several local

governments. An authority superior to both the

central and local governments make this

division of powers on a geographic basis, which

cannot be changed by either the local or

national level alone. Both levels of government

act directly on the behalf of the people through

their own sets of laws, officials, and agencies.

In the United States, for example, the Federal

Government has certain powers, and the 50

individual states have others. This division of

powers is set out in the Constitution. The

Constitution stands above both levels of

government and cannot be changed unless the

people agree to that change.

Australia, Switzerland, Canada, Mexico,

Germany, India, and some 20 other stats also

have federal forms of government today. In the

United States, the term ‘Federal Government’ is

often used to refer to the National Government,

but note that the 50 state governments are

unitary in structure, not federal.

Confederate Government

A confederation is an alliance of independent

states. A central organization, the confederate

government, only handles those matters that

the state assigns to it. Typically, confederate

governments hold limited powers in such fields

as defense and foreign commerce.

Most often, the confederacy has not had the

power to make laws that apply directly to

individuals, at least not without some further

action by the member states. A confederate

structure makes it possible for the several

states to cooperate in matters of common

concern and also retain their separate

identities.

Confederations are very rare in today’s world.

The Confederate States of America (1861-1865)

are one example in past times. A possible

modern example is the European Union (EU),

which is an assembly of 28 nations, mostly in

Europe. Through its institutions, the EU has

established free trade among its members,

launched a common currency (the Euro), and

coordinates the foreign trade and defense

policies of its members. Recently in news,

United Kingdom voted to remove itself, or exit,

from the EU for more independence, a situation which was often referred to as “Brexit”.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Number these events in the French and Indian war in order in which they happened. ___ British capture Quebec ___ Treaty of Paris
andre [41]
<h3><u>Number these events in the French and Indian war:</u></h3>

1] Prime Minister Pitt Sends British soldiers to North America

2] British capture Quebec

3] French defeated At Montreal

4] Treaty of Paris Signed

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

The event of Prime Minister Pitt sending British troops in great numbers to North America happened earliest in the series, around the year of late 1758 and early 1759. This leads into the event of the British capturing Quebec that occurred in the year of 1759.

This in turn, now leads to the events of the French being defeated in Montreal in the year of 1760. This all leads to the Treaty Of Paris being signed in the year 1763, was signed by the new King George III crowned after the fateful death of George II, of Great Britain with the representatives from United States of America on the day of September 3.

.

7 0
3 years ago
HELP PLEASEE:
fiasKO [112]
0.0 I’m scared to go up a grade0-0
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Some believe that religion is important because it provides social norms and answers to difficult questions about life and the m
    10·1 answer
  • What is the main purpose of the executive branch?
    10·1 answer
  • Clarice wakes up in a daze and remembers that she has to do laundry. On her way to the laundry room, she encounters an enormous
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following nations was part of the central powers in world war 1
    8·1 answer
  • what does the relationship between the Missouri Compromise and the Court's relationshipn in the Dred Scott King
    9·1 answer
  • FILL IN THE BLANK ___'When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of
    9·1 answer
  • In a representative democracy........(choose 2 that apply)
    6·1 answer
  • What's something u can do to fix pollution in south asia? :)
    8·1 answer
  • How does magma type influence a volcano’s explosivity?.
    5·1 answer
  • Thioesters are similar to oxygen esters of carboxylic acids except that ________.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!