DiMaggio and Powell, they pose the mechanisms of coercive, normative and mimetic, through which the institutional effects of an area that they call organizational field and to which they define like those organizations that, together, constitute a Recognized area of institutional life.
In situations where a clear course of action is indispensable, when the technologies are poor, when the goals are ambiguous, the answer to all this is to imitate, to be successful.
Isomorphism poses a very serious problem for innovation and adaptation of organizations.
For individual workers is an even more complex issue, for example: Two people who sell apples every morning on the same street implies a decrease in sales of both, a decrease in the variability of products for the public and again, a lack of Originality.
Answer:
The federal elimination of the Tariff of 1828 and a gradual reduction on import taxes over a decade.
It was racial/ethnic. The Nazis thought
that they were the supreme race and believed that anyone who was below them
deserved to be either imprisoned or exterminated. Jews, Gypsies, Eastern Europeans and all
those they considered inferior were victimized and many suffered as a result.
<span>When
it was over, the Viet Cong basically ceased to be an effective force
any longer. Their ranks were decimated. All of the territory lost during
the offensive was shortly won back. But the ability of the Communists
to launch such a widespread coordinated offensive convinced the American
media and ultimately the American public that the war was now a lost
cause and demanded a withdrawal. So, tactically, it was a military
success for the U.S. but it served as a public relations success for
North Vietnam.
I believe the answer may be </span>
<span>U.S. forces dealt the Vietcong a massive military loss and regained control of all areas that the Vietcong had attacked.</span>
