The answer fir this question is 577
Answer:
Our US Constitution is a c _ o_ n_ t_ r_a _c _t between _the government of the United States____and _____the people of the United States_(citizens)________________________.
Explanation:
The US Constitution was first drafted in 1789 by the Philadelphia convention representing 13 states. It established the ground rules for the government of the United States, aware that absolute power corrupts absolutely, given the bad blood created by the then King of Great Britain when he exercised maximum powers over his kingdom, including the then US colonies. It, therefore, built-in checks and balances between the powers of the three arms of government.
The constitution has seven articles and specifies governmental authority, processes, and procedures. It safeguards liberty, justice, and civil rights. It became effective on March 4, 1789. It has been amended 27 times.
Answer:
The Presidencies of Bush and Obama Quick Check
1. Stimulating economic growth or recovery: bailouts and tax cuts
Closing education achievement gap: No child left behind and vouchers
2. C: it ended with the election of the first African American president
3. A: children of undocumented immigrants
4. A: by lobbying officials
Answer:
the people in the west were more outgoing and ambitious than people in other areas
“One of the strangest controversies in the history of Orientalism turned upon the “origin of bhakti”, as if devotion had at some given moment been a new idea and thenceforth a fashionable one. It would have been simpler to observe that the word bhakti means primarily a given share, and therefore also the devotion or love that all liberality presupposes; and so that inasmuch as one “gives God his share” (bhagam), i.e. sacrifces, one is his bhakta. Thus in the hymn, “If thou givest me my share” amounts to saying “If thou lovest me”. It has often been pointed out that the Sacrifice was thought of as a commerce between Gods and men: but not often realised that by introducing into traditional conceptions of trade notions derived from our own internecine commercial transactions, we have falsified our understanding of the original sense of such a commerce, which was actually more of the potlatsh type, a competition in giving, than like our competitions in taking.
