Let's go through every answer to see which ones work as thesis statements.
A: No, Rainsford was not a vain hunter, and he never wanted to participate in Zaroff's "game".
B:<span> Yes, Zaroff believes that as long as your game (in this case, humans) has a slight chance, it's okay to hunt. Rainsford thinks that's just murder.</span>
<span>C: </span>Yes, Zaroff is extremely passionate about hunting. He thinks of hunting humans as just plain hunting, and he is passionate about it.
D:<span> Yes, Connell makes great use of irony in this story. One example is at the beginning of the story when Rainsford is talking to Whitney, and Rainsford says, "Who cares how a jaguar feels"? Yet, when he is the one being hunted, he thinks his feelings should matter.</span>
<span>E: Yes, some examples of red and blood used to demonstrate violence and terror are the blood-warm waters that Rainsford falls into, the blood-red lips of the General, and the blood-stained weed on the island.
So, the correct answers are B, C, D, and E.</span>
Try: <span>Life-threatening danger causes a shift in one's morals. </span> <span>OR </span> <span>Morality takes a backseat to survival when one's life is in danger. </span>
Really, it depends on the reliability and trust with the vendor. The bussiness world is tough and it is hard to find people you can trust. So when making a deal, that is a big, if not the biggest key factor.
Capulet thinks Juliet is too young to elope (get married), but cannot refuse Paris. To get more time he asks Count Paris to Court his daughter. It is his way of showing that he knows what is best for Juliet.
