All categories

3 years ago

List three reasons why a price-based system works more efficiently than central planning.

1 answer:

6 0

Three reasons a price-based system works more efficiently than central planning are flexibility, a larger selection of goods, and resources are used entirely.

Price based systems are more efficient because the demand from a product determines its price. Only enough product is produces that the market demands. Excess surpluses are not generated in a price based system.

You might be interested in

The premium of a health insurance plan refers to the

daser333 [38]

Total Cost of Insurance Coverage

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. You have been asked to appraise the market value of a three-bedroom house with two bathrooms that is going to be sold tomorro

Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

Current price of house = $222,000

Explanation:

given data

property that sold = $275,000

values decreasing at rate = $2,000 per week

Each bedroom = $30,000

a bathroom = $15,000

solution

we get here Price of 3 bedroom & 3 bathroom house (4 weeks ago) is

Price of 3 bedroom & 3 bathroom house (4 weeks ago) = $275,000 - $30,000 - $15,000

Price of 3 bedroom & 3 bathroom house (4 weeks ago) = $230000

and

reduction in price at $2000 per week for 4 weeks= 4 × 2000

reduction in price at $2000 per week for 4 weeks = ($8,000)

Current price of house = $230000 - $8,000

Current price of house = $222,000

8 0

3 years ago

20 points, 1 question , some reading

kow [346]

my insta dfl.jacob i can help you

3 0

3 years ago

Cross Country Movers has just gone public. Under a firm commitment agreement, the firm received $19.84 for each of the 2.12 mill

nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

= $11,670,200/ $41,329,800 x 100 = 28.24%

Explanation:

The question is to compute the flotation cost of the funds raised by Cross Country Movers after going public. Furthermore, it should be presented as a percentage.

The formula therefore, is = Total Direct Costs / Net Amount raised x 100

Step 1: Total Direct Costs

= Direct Costs (legal and others) + Indirect costs + (Initial Offering Price - the amount received for each share x total shares sold) + (Price rise in stock per share - the initial offering price per share x total shares sold)

= $626,000 + $105,000 + 9,667,200‬+ 1,272,000‬ = $11,670,200

Step 2: Net Amount Raised

= Amount recieved per share x total shares - Direct and indirect costs

= $19.84 x 2,120,000 shares - $626,000 + $105,000

= 42,060,800‬- 731,000‬ = $41,329,800

Step 3: Floatation Cost in Percentage

= $11,670,200/ $41,329,800 x 100 = 28.24%

4 0

3 years ago

When the price of butter was "low," consumers spent $5 billion annually on its consumption. When the price doubled, consumer exp

faust18 [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is: No, this situation is impossible.

Explanation:

To begin with, in the reality the situation with the demand curve is all the opposite. The law of demand establishes that there is an indirect relationship between the price of a product and its quantity demanded in the market, therefore that when the price of a good increases then its quantity demanded decreases. And it is by logic as well, because no one will buy more of something if the products is more expensive than it was before. Therefore that the situation in the text is impossible and it could only be opposite.

7 0

3 years ago