No the sum would always be 360 degrees
Hello from MrBillDoesMath
Answer: + 4/7, 6 (13/14)
Discussion:
Let L be the larger of the two numbers and S the smaller of the two. Then the first sentence translates into this:
-6L - L = -4 =>
-7L = -4 => (divide both sides by -7)
L = - (-4)/(-7) = + 4/7 (*)
The second sentence translates to
2 (L + S) = 15 => (divide both sides by 2)
(L +S) = 15/2 => (subtract L from each side)
S = 15/2 - L = 15/2 - 4/7 (using (*) above)
So
S = 15*7/(2*7) - (4*2)/(7*2) (combine over common denominator of 14)
S = 105/14 - 8/14 = 97/14 = 6 13/14
Something is crazy here! While 2(L +S) = 15 -- check it out -- our larger number L ( =4/7) is actually smaller than the S number (6 13/14)! Maybe I should have called them Y and X, respectively, as you suggested!
Thank you,
Mr. B
2) 100
3) 49
4) 19
5) idk
6) idk
7) 7
Answer:
1 a.) 2t – 2
1 b.) –9z + 4
2 a.) –2v + 3
2 b.) –13k – 9
3 a.) 7w − 2
3 b.) 10s
4 a.) 5
4 b.) –3p + 11
5 a.) –29x + 9
b.) 15v – 60x – 2
a.) 25n + 2
b.) –15n
a.) –71x + 4
b.) –15b
Step-by-step explanation:
- <em>NOTE: I am kind of confused about the way this question is formatted, so I tried to answer everything I could decipher.</em>
1 a.) –2t + 5t – 2 – t → 2t – 2
1 b.) –5z + 4 – 4z → –9z + 4
2 a.) 8v + 3 – 10v → –2v + 3
2 b.) –6 – 6k – 3 – 7k → –13k – 9
3 a.) –6 – 3w + 4 + 10w → 7w − 2
3 b.) 9s + s → 10s
4 a.) 6 + 8b – 1 – 8b → 5
4 b.) 1p + 6 + 5 – 4p → –3p + 11
5 a.) 4x – 3x + 9 – 6x 5 → –29x + 9
b.) 9v + 6v – 2 – 10x 6 → 15v – 60x – 2
a.) n + 2 – (–4)n 6 → 25n + 2
b.) 6n – 3n 7 → –15n
a.) –4x – 4x + 4 – 9x 7 → –71x + 4
b.) –9b + (–6)b → –15b
