B. historians shouldn't project modern ideas
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>A. The constitution already limited Powers of government, so a list of rights was not needed. </em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The idea behind having a Constitution is that it limits the powers of the government and sets certain law and rules that are to be followed while governing. Hence when there were debates for the "ratification" of the Constitution, the Federalists concluded that the Constitution didn’t require any list of rights, as the Constitution itself limits the powers of the government. Moreover, Bill of Rights was unnecessary as the Constitution was drafted with a strong concept of "Separation of Powers", and the Check and Balance system. Under this the government has been divided into three categories and these three categories check and limit the powers of each other.
Weimar Constitution adopted in Germany
I think that I would think they are overreacting. I would think they were going just a bit crazy because we were raising the price of tea. I really do think that we should submit and let the colonists have more representation in parliament, after all, it would be fair. That would probably stop them from revolting and keep the British Empire a Global Superpower. <span />