1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mylen [45]
3 years ago
13

Early civilization benefitted greatly from the development of tools. According to technological "ages", in what order were the f

ollowing materials used to make tools? A) Iron, Steel, Bronze B) Stone, Bronze, Iron C) Stone, Bronze, Steel D) Bronze, Stone, Steel
History
1 answer:
MAVERICK [17]3 years ago
3 0

The correct option is B) Stone, Bronze, Iron

There are three ages: Stone Age, Bronze Age and Iron Age. These ages are divided chronologically according to the material with which tools were created: We have the Stone Age in first place since stone was used to make implements. This age is a pre historic period between 8700 and 2000 BCE. In the second place we have the Bronze Age, in which bronze was mainly used to create tools. During this age, early characteristics of urban civilization were found. And finally, we have the Iron Age. During this period, tools and weapons were made of carbon steel (ironworking).

The system of dividing the ages in 3 categories was created by C.J. Thomsen in order to classify objects according to the material with which they were created.  


You might be interested in
What is the name of the us acquisition of the southern strip of the land in Arizona and New Mexico in 1853
lisabon 2012 [21]
Gasden Purchase--the strip of land purchased from Mexico in 1853 was negotiated by James Gasden. 

The US wanted this strip of land to complete the southern branch of the Transcontinental Railroad. Gasden was the minister to Mexico and sent to negotiate the purchase of the land as well as create a final border agreement with Mexican president, Santa Anna. The land was purchased for $10 million and settled the US-Mexico border. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why might violence be tempting to activists? Why might it be risky to their movements?
Neko [114]

Answer:

We agree with a number of Thaler’s points. First, he is right to question those on the outside who tell activists what to do or offer strategic or tactical advice. Local activists know their context best, and specific instructions from outside actors can place activists at great risk. People struggling under such conditions often say they learn the most from being in touch with other activists. But when activists approach scholars or practitioners for information or resources, it is crucial to make sure that a broad range of experience and evidence are publicly available and accessible. That was the purpose of a recent event hosted by the United States Institute of Peace that featured various scholarly and activist perspectives on how movements respond to repression.

Second, we appreciate how the article highlights the role of human agency in the struggle against authoritarianism and other forms of oppression. Civil resistance offers a way for marginalized and excluded groups to wage struggle using a wide range of direct-action tactics that can be used to disrupt injustices and challenge the status quo. It is more than simply an ideal or a normative preference. We also recognize that when activists seek out support or information, they decide for themselves whether the information is relevant to their context, or whether to discard it.

Third, we share his denunciation of repressive state violence targeting unarmed civilian dissenters. It is a regrettable reality that states often respond to those who challenge state power with violent repression, regardless of which methods of resistance they use. This state violence should never be normalized, nor should false moral equivalences or “both sides”-type narratives be tolerated. Outside actors should stand in solidarity with those fighting oppression and prioritize actions that protect fundamental human rights and mitigate violence targeting unarmed dissidents.

Yet we differ on other important points. First, critics often claim that nonviolence is part of a Western hegemonic discourse that reinforces the legitimacy of state violence while simultaneously encouraging oppressed people to carry the unfair burden of good behavior under crushing conditions. Discourses advocating nonviolent resistance are in no way hegemonic, nor are they Western in origin. Over the millennia, states and nonstate groups have justified violence on the basis of its necessity, used cultural relativism as a way to prevent critiques of violence, and persecuted, imprisoned, and executed those who have advocated nonviolent approaches, which threaten two hegemonic discourses—the state’s monopoly on power, and the normalcy and necessity of violence.

Nonviolent resistance has been a counterhegemonic force that challenges both of these dominant discourses. The technique was developed and embraced by people living under colonial regimes throughout the global south, as well as by marginalized and oppressed communities within the West. Despite their views that violence was preferable to passivity, practitioners such as Mohandas Gandhi and Badshah Khan saw mass civil resistance as the only way for them to challenge the violence of Western imperialism on pragmatic grounds. Over the course of the past century, the technique spread from the global south to the United States and Europe, where people fighting racism, sexism, poverty, war, authoritarianism, and economic inequality have seen the strategic value of fighting structural violence by building and wielding inclusive power from below using nonviolent resistance.

Activists from around the world continue to make arguments about the strategic utility of nonviolent resistance, without any nudging from Westerners or Western researchers. Protesters facing a massive crackdown in Baghdad attempted to maintain nonviolent discipline by shouting “Peaceful! Peaceful!” while under fire from security forces. Women in Lebanon have organized human chains to maintain nonviolent discipline in the ongoing movement there, which is now in a particularly delicate phase. Dissidents associated with the Sudanese Revolution insisted on maintaining a remarkable level of nonviolent discipline, despite bloody crackdowns attempting to throw the transition into disarray. And in Algeria, the ongoing movement there has remained both disruptive and restrained in its use of violence.

Our book, Why Civil Resistance Works, presents evidence that mass, broad-based participation is critical to movement success and that movements that rely primarily on nonviolent tactics tend to enjoy more diverse participation, which in turn yields a number of political advantages for the campaign. Updated analyses reinforce these earlier findings, and other research helps to unpack these dynamics at a more granular level.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
*QUICK PLS*
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

c. objects

Explanation:

I think it means an object or a thing. It means an object made by a human, usually historical or cultural.

May I please have Brainliest??!!!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
identify the three main types of economic activities. then tell one way they are similar and one way they are different
grigory [225]
<span>1) command economies; 2) market economies and 3) traditional economies</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which group gained the most from the opening of the panama canal in 1914
zloy xaker [14]
To combat the threat of tropical diseases such as malaria and yellow fever, the United States decided to use new measures to eradicate the disease before the construction of the Panama Canal.  Under the leadership of Colonel William Crawford Gorgas, many changes were made.  When it was discovered that mosquitoes were the source of the disease, Gorgas who was appointed as the head of hospital and sanitation, he made sure that containers with stagnant water were removed because mosquitoes lay their eggs there.  He also built domestic water systems to eliminate the need to collect rain water.  Prophylactic Quinine was supplied to the people in the area and fumigation and oiling of streams were launched.  Those who were sick were quarantined and workers would sleep in screened structures so that mosquitoes would not be able to bite them.  These programs resulted in the successful elimination of tropical diseases in the area and the health of workers improved.
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which African American rights activist advocated an accommodating, patient approach to equality?
    14·1 answer
  • 3 facts about the Industrial revolution
    10·1 answer
  • What writing system does Egypt use today?
    11·1 answer
  • Which angel is reported to have appeared to Mohammad
    11·1 answer
  • What was the north's main goal in the western campaign?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the American strategy for the war against Japan in the Pacific?
    15·1 answer
  • 360,000:240,000 into a reduced fraction​
    5·1 answer
  • Which allience had the greatest number of soldiers?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the purpose at the start of the constitutional
    11·1 answer
  • Solve these all question please
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!