In a very resilient response to the December 1979 Soviet Miliary interference into Afghanistan, President Jimmy Carter withdrew the SALT II treaty because it was his response to the invasion of Afghanistan. These actions specified that the US-Soviet association had been harshly damaged by the Russian action in Afghanistan and that the age of agreement had ended.
Answer:
Skilled craftsmen and craftswomen who could earn wages for their owner
Explanation:
Answer:
Most women, indentured servants, landless poor, and African Americans could not vote.
Explanation: Most women, indentured servants, landless poor, and African Americans could not vote, only men could vote and some women
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
A. schools and other services.
