<span>Both the medical model and the public health model have in common a desire to educate people about their health, healthy options, and consequences of not paying attention to health issues. The medical model may, at times, include too much information for some to understand the bottom-line, while the public health model may be watered down in an attempt to reach the masses.</span>
Where is the question? Thanks.
Answer:
This is not necessarily evidence that the proportion of Americans who are afraid to fly has decreaseddecreased because belowbelow 0.10 because the proportion of sample, is nothing very close to 0.10.
Explanation:
n = 1100
p = 0.10
Using the formula np(1-p), we will have
= 1100(0.10)*(1 - 0.10)
= 1100*0.10*0.90
= 99
99 ≥ 10
This satisfies normal distribution condition. That is, proportion of sample are normally distributed.
Explanation:
Country can get lots of foreign currency as the remittance which can be used to establish industries in the country. Such industries provide job opportunities in the country.
People who go overseas to work can learn different skills and technologies which can be beneficial for the development of our own country.
Answer:
The correct answers are letters: "A", "B", "C", and "D".
Explanation:
As a monopoly, Nature's Crunch will be benefited in profit terms if any chemical involved non-organic vegetables growing process is affected somehow. Then, <em>a tomato blight affecting chemically treated plants, an increase in the cost of chemical pesticides, and a new report about the environmental dangers of chemically treated plants</em> would automatically generate more sales for Nature's Crunch. Besides, it does not matter under what scenario, <em>income tax cuts</em> <em>for all consumers</em> will generate more revenue both for organic and non-organic industries.
