Answer:
Alejandro´s opportunity cost is 2/3 of a chart.
Roger´s opportunity cost is 1/2 of a chart.
Explanation:
The cost of opportunity represent the benefits that you misses out on when choosing one alternative over another.
In this case , we can say that Alejandro and Roger can produce 2 product. And if they produce one , they loose the possibility of producing the other.
We can Illustrate this situation with a production possibility frontiers graph and if we increase the quantity produced of one good, will decrease the other, because the limited resources.
Alejandro produce 3 three pages of the paper in the same time it takes him to create two charts. We use cross multiplication to get how many charts Alejandro produce at the same time he produce a single page
1___x
3___2 so x= 1x2/3
So , in the time he produce a single page of the essay, he could produce 2/3 of a chart. This is the cost opportunity.
Roger can write two pages of the paper in the same time he can produce a single chart. So, in the time he produce a single page of the essay he could make half of a chart.
85% of the wealth comes from 10% of the wealthiest people
In the rooms because that is where the amenities are located ie the bed comfort, the TV, the view, the room size and then the leaning services and the room service (for food from the restaurants)
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Debt = D ÷ (E + D)
= 0.8 ÷ (1 + 0.8)
= 0.4444
Now
Weight of equity = 1 - Debt
= 1 - 0.4444
= 0.5556
As per Dividend discount model
Price = Dividend in 1 year ÷ (cost of equity - growth rate)
40 = $2 ÷ (Cost of equity - 0.06)
Cost of equity = 11%
Cost of debt
K = N
Let us assume the par value be $1,000
Bond Price =∑ [(Annual Coupon) ÷ (1 + YTM)^k] + Par value ÷ (1 + YTM)^N
k=1
K =25
$804 =∑ [(7 × $1000 ÷ 100)/(1 + YTM ÷ 100)^k] + $1000 ÷ (1 + YTM ÷ 100)^25
k=1
YTM = 9
After tax cost of debt = cost of debt × (1 - tax rate)
= 9 × (1 - 0.21)
= 7.11
WACC = after tax cost of debt × W(D) + cost of equity ×W(E)
= 7.11 × 0.4444 + 11 × 0.5556
= 9.27%
As we can see that the WACC is lower than the return so it should be undertake the expansion
Answer:
the price will grow to $ 507,571.77 If it continues with the same grow rate
Explanation:
first we solve for the rate:
2006 - 1895 = 111 years
![Nominal (1+r)^{n} = FV\\150 (1+r)^{111} = 70,000\\\\r = \sqrt[111]{70,000 / 150 } -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Nominal%20%281%2Br%29%5E%7Bn%7D%20%3D%20FV%5C%5C150%20%281%2Br%29%5E%7B111%7D%20%3D%2070%2C000%5C%5C%5C%5Cr%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B111%5D%7B70%2C000%20%2F%20150%20%7D%20-1)
r = 0.06
Now we apply this rate for the year 2040:
2040 - 2006 = 34 years
Principal 70,000.00
time 34.00
rate 0.06000
Amount 507,571.77
