Answer:
The difference between the wages at the two jobs plus 150.00.
Explanation:
There was a contract of one year and as per Severance pay h and H has to pay this amount.
Answer: The correct answer is " a. $92,000.".
Explanation: The explicit costs are observable, that is, those that we can easily take into account and decrease our operating result (salaries paid to employees, material costs, taxes, etc.)
So her total explicit cost were: $12 000 + $65 000 + $15 000 = $92 000.
Answer:
The answer is "Knowledge discovery & predictions category or anomalous detention assessment or Data mining".
Explanation:
Regression is a type of analysis in which some parameters' relationships are determined by the values of other variables, whereas departure detection is a type of analysis wherein the goal is to find changes in data from previously observed values. Enigma detaining analysis, often known as knowledge discovery analysis, is a sort for anomaly incarceration analysis, while regression is classed as a forecast.
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
Answer: conducted substantial business with Ohio residents through the Web site.
Explanation: The sliding - scale standard confirms when exercising jurisdiction over an out of state defendant is allowed. It is only allowed when significant business has been conducted by this out of state company over the Internet with another state. In this case the out of state defendant is Trading Post, a Washington company, and it has dealt in transactions over the Internet with the state of Ohio via its website. Because the business conducted in Ohio is significant, it gives Robert the grounds to sue Trading Post, even though Trading Post is not based in the same state as Robert.
