Answer:
B. Customer Equity
Explanation:
In its focus on bottom-line financial value, the customer equity approach offers limited guidance for go-to-market strategies and does not fully account for competitive moves. Customer equity can be defined as the total value of all the customers of any firm. It means any firm will have more customer equity if has large number of customers who make frequent purchases as well. Customer loyalty is directly proportional to the customer equity, more is the customer loyalty, the more will be the customer equity of any brand. Although it is very much important for any business but it does not tell about the go-to market strategies and competitive moves that what business you should be in and what business you could be in.
Answer:
Explanation:
We were informed from the question that;
BEFORE; the tax, 30,000 bottles of wine were sold every week at a price of $4 per bottle.
AFTER; After the tax, 25,000 bottles of wine are sold every week; consumers pay $6 per bottle and producers receive $3 per bottle (after paying the tax).
✓✓The amount of tax on wine = $6 - $3 = $3 per bottle
✓✓The tax burden on consumers = The amount paid after tax - The amount paid before tax
= $6 - $4
=$2 per bottle
✓✓The tax burden on Producers = Price received before tax - price received after tax
= $4 - $3
=$1 per bottle
Hence, The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $3 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $2 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $1 per bottle.
The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been smaller if the tax had been levied on consumers(FALSE)
This is false, since the The tax burden on Producers is $1 per bottle while that of The tax burden on consumer is $2 per bottle.
Answer:
b.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is a liquidated damages clause if the amount is a reasonable estimate of the loss on a breach. This a safety feature placed in order to recover money lost on the negligence of the party that breached the contract, so that the other party does not suffer much loss.
Based on the information given the aggregate expenditures must be: $295 billion.
Using this formula
Aggregate expenditure= Consumption expenditures+ Total investment + Exports
Where:
Consumption expenditures=$200 billion
Total investment= $50 billion
Exports=$45 billion
Let plug in the formula
Aggregate expenditure=$200 billion+$50 billion+$45 billion
Aggregate expenditure=$295 billion
Inconclusion the aggregate expenditures must be: $295 billion.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/14956152
