1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MariettaO [177]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following would be an argument for using the gross cost of plant and equipment as part of operating assets in retur

n on investment computations? a. It is consistent with the conputation of net operating income, which includes depreciation as an operating expense.b. It is consistent with the balance sheet preventation of plant and equipment. c. It eliminates the age of equipment as afactor in ROI computations d. It discourages the replacement of old worn-out eqipmt because of the dramatic, advene effect on RO.
Business
1 answer:
omeli [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Correct Answer:

a. It is consistent with the computation of net operating income, which includes depreciation as an operating expense.

Explanation:

The above option is the right answer due to fact that depreciation of the equipment  is an operating expenses. Therefore, the gross cost is used as part of operating assets during computation.

You might be interested in
A sporting goods manufacturer budgets production of 57,000 pairs of ski boots in the first quarter and 48,000 pairs in the secon
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

Cost of purchase for first quarter = $766,500  

Explanation:

Total production of current quarter = 57,000 pairs

Raw material required for above = 57,000 X 2 kg per pair = 114,000 kg

Less: Opening inventory of raw material 28,500 kg = 114,000 - 28,500 = 85,500 kg required for quarter 1

Also provided that closing inventory shall be 25% of total raw material required for next quarter.

Raw material required in second quarter = 48,000 pairs X 2 kg each = 96,000 kg

25% of above = 96,000 X 25% = 24,000 kg

Total raw material to be purchased in current quarter that is first quarter = 85,500 kg + 24,000 kg = 109,500 kg

Rate not provided assumed to be same as of opening inventory that is $7 per kg, therefore cost of purchase for first quarter = 109,500 kg X $7 = $766,500  

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Baruch Shemtov's product, and how did he begin creating it?
N76 [4]

Answer:

Baruch Shemtov's product is tie

Explanation:

Baruch Yehudah Shemtov  was born on September 22, 1987.

Baruch has passionate about the design and the fashion from his young age, he was launched his first line of ties at just age 15 years.

he is a fashion entrepreneur since his junior class of high school

Today also Baruch ties routinely sellout in the tony department store and online

Baruch neckties and all accessories are made in USA

and In 2013, he launched boy ties collection and he coordinating with father-son neckties range at Bergdorf Goodman

5 0
2 years ago
Jefferson Company has sales of $300,000 and cost of goods available for sale of $270,000. If the gross profit ratio is typically
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

$60000

Explanation:

Given: Sales = $300000.

           Cost of goods available for sale= $270000.

           The gross profit ratio= 30%

First finding the gross profit out of total sales.

Gross profit= 30\% \times 300000

Gross profit= \$ 90000

∴ Cost of goods sold= Total\ sales - gross\ profit

Cost of goods sold= 300000-90000

Cost of goods sold=  \$ 210000

Hence, cost of goods sold= \$ 210000

Now, finding estimated cost of the ending inventory.

Cost of ending inventory= cost\ of\ goods\ available\ for\ sale - cost\ of\ goods\ sold

⇒ Cost of ending inventory=  \$ 270000- \$ 210000

∴ Cost of ending inventory=  \$ 60000

Hence, estimated cost of the ending inventory under the gross profit method would be $60000.

3 0
2 years ago
Rockeagle Corporation began fiscal Year 2 with the following balances in its inventory accounts.
irinina [24]

Answer:

I solved this manually. please try to follow up with the calculations.

ending inventory balance of

a. Raw material = $31000

b. work in progress = $49000

c. finished goods = $19000

Explanation:

<u>for</u><u> </u><u>raw</u><u> </u><u>material</u><u>:</u><u>-</u>

balance at beginning 30,000 + purchase of 125000 - issue of 124000

= 30000+125000-124000

= 31,000

the ending balance is 31000

<u>for work in progress inventory:-</u>

beginning inventory 45000 + 124000 current cost of issued material + 162000 direct wages + overhead 24000

= 45000+124000+162000+24000

= $355000

we subtract 306000 costs of goods manufactured from this value

= $355000-306000

= 49000 wip ending balance

<u>for</u><u> </u><u>finish</u><u>ed</u><u> </u><u>goods</u><u> </u><u>inven</u><u>tory</u><u>:</u><u>-</u>

begining inventory 14000 + 306000 costs of goods manufactured - 301000 costs of goods sold

= 14000+306000-301000

= $19000

<u>2</u><u>.</u><u> </u><u>schedule</u><u> for</u><u> </u><u>costs</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>goods</u><u> </u><u>manu</u><u>factured</u><u>:</u><u>-</u>

beginning inventory 30000 + purchase 125000 - ending inventory

= 30000+125000-31000

= 124000

124,000+162000 labour cost+24000

<u>total cost of manufacturing = 310000</u>

310000+begining wip of 45,000 - ending inventory of 49000

= 310000+45000-49000

= 306,000 costs of goods manufactured

we add this value to beginning inventory of finished goods-ending inventory

= 306000+14000-19000

= $301000 costs of goods sold

3. income statement:-

revenue of 400000 - 301000 costs of good sold = 99000

99000-36000 selling expenses

= $63000

4 0
3 years ago
For the doctrine of promissory estoppel to​ apply, which of the following is NOT a required​ element? A. the promisor should hav
erik [133]

Answer:

C) there was an​ offer, acceptance, and consideration

Explanation:

The doctrine of promissory estoppel requires that the following 5 elements must exist:

  1. The parties must anticipate that some type of legal relationship will exist between them.
  2. One party must have made a promise to another party.
  3. One party must rely on the promise made by the other party.  
  4. The party that relied on the promise made by the other party must suffer a detriment if the promise is not fulfilled.
  5. Unconscionability , in other words, there is nothing that forbids the party from performing the promise.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the difference between accounting profits and economic profits? which of the two concepts is more appropriate for explai
    12·1 answer
  • Emma's property is assessed at $650,000. her property qualified for a $50,000 homestead tax exemption and was appraised at $800,
    15·1 answer
  • In 2018, Mark has $18,000 short-term capital loss, $7,000 28% gain, and $6,000 0%/15%/20% gain. Which of the statements below is
    9·1 answer
  • Catherine wanted to purchase a digital camera. Hence, she visited an online retailer's website to learn more about the different
    10·1 answer
  • Firm A currently dumps 157 tons of chemicals into the local river. Firm B currently dumps 183 tons of chemicals into the local r
    8·1 answer
  • A strategy is: Multiple Choice an action plan to maximize rewards in the current period in return for big risks. a procedure for
    6·1 answer
  • Chiko bought 75 shares of stock at $19.58 per share. She recelved total dividends of $73.42 during the year. At the end of the y
    8·1 answer
  • Microbiotics currently sells all of its frozen dinners cash-on-delivery but believes it can increase sales by offering supermark
    6·1 answer
  • Someone answer this!
    12·2 answers
  • What is strategy?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!