Answer: B)
Explanation:
This is showing that he doesn't care about his daughter because he is trying to sell her to the men.
He wanted to sell her for any price and because of that they were offering him ten pounds and he refused it. He refused it because he was thinking that he should get five pounds because when the weekend comes he would drink for those five pounds and ten pounds would involve him in the responsibility to drink too much.
Answer: a: simile b: alliteration c: simile d: personification e: hyperbole f: simile g: simile h: simile i: alliteration j: metaphor
Explanation: Similes are comparing unlike things with like or as. This means that a, c, g and h are similes. However on d it also uses the word as but it's personification. That's because personification is giving nonliving things human like characteristics. A chair cannot wait, but a human can therefore it's personification. Alliteration is the repetiotion of the beginning sound on a set of words. So because most of the words in b and i start with the same sound, it's alliteration. E is a hyperbole because a hyperbole is an exaggeration. The speaker of the statement doesn't actually have a million things to do, they're exaggerating which makes it a hyperbole. Lastly j is a metaphor because it compares 2 unlike things without using like or as, instead using was. Hope this helps :)
Hello there, to help right of the bat. I know B is not the right answer. But after reading i belive that A is the correct answer choice because Churchhill is basically saying that during WW2, the British and the French saved Belgium, but only after it was attacked. Churchhill is saying that if they would not have been neutral they could have saved Poland from Axis attacks. So i belive that the answer is A
When repetition is being used in a passage, the author wants you to know that whatever being repeated is a main point, a key in understanding, or the point of a concept. If something is being repeated in a question, that can help you deceiver what the question is asking, or any clues given.
I hope this helped you.
Brainliest answer is always appreciated. <span />
Answer: With their collaboration and dialogue they are advancing the plot.
Explanation:
Interaction between Montresor and Fortunato is the only thing that is advancing the plot because there is not much happening besides their dialogue. In their dialogue, we can see the hint that is showing us that the letter would be ruined and demised.
Montresor is wanting the revenge and he is trying to set a diabolical scheme because of it which is showing us contradictory in him because he is saying something that doesn't approve his acts. Since the story is told from his perspective, we are more likely on his side and we are empathizing with him.
Montresor is telling to Fortunato that he has something that is mistaken for Amontillado and that is a light Spanish sherry. After that, Fortunato is saying that he has forgotten his family's motto which is "No one attacks me with impunity" and after that, he is quitting the interaction and answering to him when he is saying “For the love of God, Montresor!”.
