Answer:
m<1 = 60°
m<2 = 30°
m<3 = 90°
Step-by-step explanation:
Recall some properties of Rectangle. Thus:
The four angles of a rectangle are right angles = 90° each.
Opposite sides of a rectangle are also parallel to each other.
With the knowledge of these, we can solve for angles 1, 2, and 3.
Thus:
m<1 = 60° (alternate interior angles are congruent)
m<2 + m<1 = 90° (complementary angles)
m<2 + 60° = 90° (substitution)
m<2 = 30° (substraction property of equality)
m<3 = 90° (angle of a rectangle)
400$
Explanation:
In 1992, the price is 28000$ and 9600$ in 1996 so in 4 years the value the car lost is 18400$
Dividing 18400 by 4 years we get 4600 depreciation value per year.
Between 1996 and 1998 there is 2 years
So in 1998 the value of the car will be:
9600 (value in 1996) - 2x4600 = 400$
We have two points:
The point slope form of the line:
Substitute
Answer:
Answer:
none of the above? sorry not too sure
What Lewis did wrong was that; He budgeted more than the maximum recommended amount of money for transportation.
<h3>How to budget effectively?</h3>
We are given;
Net spendable income = $2,000 per month
Now, we see how much he has budgeted for other items such as Car payments, Gas/Oil, Insurance, License/Registration, Taxes, Maintenance/Repair.
Now, from the recommended transportation budget of between 15% - 20% of the net spendable income, we can see that he would likely spend more than that if we add the cost of maintenance and repair.
Thus, what Lewis did wrong was that he budgeted more than the maximum recommended amount of money for transportation.
Read more about Budget at; brainly.com/question/6663636
#SPJ1
