Answer:
false
Explanation:
they are made in the bone marrow
I can't be completely accurate without the texts, but based on my own knowledge I would have to say:
Explanation:
Yes, I think communities should use these green energies because not only does it keep the atmosphere safer and cleaner, it could help tremendously in the case that we run out of fossil fuels before we can find an alternative. Yes there are environmental risks, such as birds dying from wind turbines, but the lack of electricity might be more severe.
The evolution of molecular biology has made possible to establish a new classification of all organisms according to their DNA, and it's called phylogenetic classification. This classification group living beings according to their kinship it is established according to anatomical, and especially genetic, based on the similarity of genes between species.
This made it possible to discover kinship ties between species of which there is no suspicion of any morphological link between them, something which the old classification (the traditional classification) was incapable of doing (and this proves the importance of the DNA and genes in organisms classification.
The scientist who refuses to consider new evidence, assuming he or she is not biased or incompetent could do it because if there is a big amount of evidence indicating otherwise, this one new piece of evidence is unlikely and they prefer to wait for more evidence or for analysis of whether this current evidence is not false.
thus this scientist is being skeptical (practicing skepticism) by ignoring this new evidence.
D. successive generations of offspring