Help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help hel
p help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help help
Again
Again
2 answers:
You might be interested in
To get the answer first we have to find full numbers.
We can use proportion
2/3 ----------------------- 375
1 -------------------------- x
Crossmultiply now
2/3*x=375 /:2/3
x=
x=
- its the answer A)
Now we have to find how much were originally on the card.
To get the answer we can just multiply 562 times 1/4.
562*1/4=140 - its the asnwer B)
We can use proportion
2/3 ----------------------- 375
1 -------------------------- x
Crossmultiply now
2/3*x=375 /:2/3
x=
x=
Now we have to find how much were originally on the card.
To get the answer we can just multiply 562 times 1/4.
562*1/4=140 - its the asnwer B)
Answer:
$80,000
Step-by-step explanation:
Under a Comparative negligence theory, people involved in an accident are entitled to compensation according to their contributions towards the accident. In this case, Annette contributed 20% to the collision and, thus, should receive 100% - 20% of her total loss determined by the jury. Annette should be awarded:
Therefore, the jury should award Annette $80,000