Answer:
The answer is stated below.
Explanation:
Gilmer-Aikin Law is the piece of legislation that has established a public school system in the districts of Texas and its funding depends upon the local taxes. It created the Texas Education Society to monitor the public education in its districts. It not only created a system of financial assistance to public school from local taxes but also fixed the minimum number of teaching days in the schools in an academic year.
Answer:Universal suffrage (also called universal franchise, general suffrage, and common suffrage of the common man) gives the right to vote to all adult citizens, regardless of wealth, income, gender, social status, race, ethnicity, political stance, or any other restriction, subject only to relatively minor exceptions.[1][2] In its original 19th-century usage by reformers in Britain, universal suffrage was understood to mean only universal manhood suffrage; the vote was extended to women later, during the women's suffrage movement.[3][4]
There are variations among countries in terms of specifics of the right to vote; the minimum age is usually between 18 and 25 years (see age of majority) and "the insane, certain classes of convicted criminals, and those punished for certain electoral offenses" sometimes lack the right to vote.[2]
In the first modern democracies, governments restricted the vote to those with property and wealth, which almost always meant a minority of the male population.[5] In some jurisdictions, other restrictions existed, such as requiring voters to practice a given religion.[6] In all modern democracies, the number of people who could vote has increased progressively with time.[7][8] The 19th century saw many movements advocating "universal [male] suffrage", most notably in Europe, Great Britain and North America.[9][7]
Explanation:
Answer:
This statement is True. Opposing views on the right to privacy played a major role the Supreme Courts decision to legalize abortion.
Explanation:
Roe v. Wade (1973) is a Supreme Court case ruling that transformed American attitudes towards privacy. The debate about abortion rights that is represented in this case brought the idea of our American right to privacy into the mainstream. The ruling was passed with a margin of 7-2 and was largely based on the process clause contained in the Fourteenth Amendment: “…nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” It was thus that the Supreme Court ruled that criminalizing abortion violated a woman’s constitutional right to privacy.
