1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
S_A_V [24]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following could most likely be a problem when selecting a surveiliant?

Business
1 answer:
djyliett [7]3 years ago
4 0

the answer is d; college educated


You might be interested in
L Corporation produces and sells 15,300 units of Product X each month. The selling price of Product X is $23 per unit, and varia
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

<em><u>It would generate a financial disadvantage for 62,800</u></em>

Explanation:

\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-&continued&discontinued&differential\\Sales&351,900&0&-351,900\\Variable&-260,100&0&260,100\\Contribution&91,800&0&-91,800\\Fixed&-103,000&-74,000&29,000\\total&-11,200&-74,000&-62,800\\\end{array}\right]

It would generate a financial disadvantage for 62,800

Because the product, while is having a loss, their contribution cover is enought to cover at least the avoidable fixed cost.

5 0
3 years ago
Maurice is buying a property from Robert. At the initial property viewing, Robert tells Maurice that the property is 4.1 acres.
andreev551 [17]

Answer:

The contract is voidable.

Explanation:

The survey discovered a misrepresentation in the consideration (the size of the land), so that means that Maurice can choose to void it or not. A voidable contract is a contract that can be voided. In this case, the injured party is only Maurice, so only he can void it, or choose not to. They might negotiate a discount or something, it is up to him.

8 0
3 years ago
To tolerate a risk is to simply ignore it? true or false
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

if you ignored it it would get worse and if you ignore you might get hurt aswell.

3 0
3 years ago
The Tuck Shop began the current month with inventory costing $19,000, then purchased inventory at a cost of $52,950. The perpetu
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Inventory shrinkage = $1,322

Explanation:

We know,

Inventory shrinkage = Ending inventory - Actual inventory at hand

Given,

Actual inventory at hand = $13,500

Ending inventory = Beginning inventory + Purchase - Inventory sold(Costing price)

Or, Ending inventory = $19,000 + $52,950 - $57,128

Or, Ending inventory = $71,950 - $57,128

Or, Ending inventory = $14,822

Therefore,

Inventory shrinkage = Ending inventory - Actual inventory at hand

Or, Inventory shrinkage = $14,822 - $13,500

Or, Inventory shrinkage = $1,322

5 0
3 years ago
When she was in college, Jammie Thomas-Rasset wrote a case study on Napster, the online peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing network,
andrezito [222]

Answer:

1. Is Thomas-Rasset liable for copyright infringement? Yes he is liable for copyright infringement. What action did Thomas-Rasset have to take in order to share twenty-four copyrighted songs available for distribution on KaZaA?

-shared her downloaded music files using kazaa

2.Is file sharing always prohibited?NO

3. File sharing is prohibited _____.

when it is used to download and store ---copyrighted music

4. Did Jammie share copyrighted music?YES

5.Sharing copyrighted music constitutes infringement under the

- copyright act

6. Can Thomas-Rasset remedy her wrongful conduct by replacing her hard drive?NO

7.Why or why not? The illegal file sharing WAS already done.

8.Who is an innocent infringer? A person who IS NOT aware and had no reason to believe that his or her acts constituted copyright infringement.

9. Was Thomas-Rasset an innocent infringer? NO

10. Why? She had written a case study on Napster and knew file sharing was WRONG.

11.Did Thomas-Rasset help her case by replacing her hard drive to conceal her acts?B. NO

12. Was Thomas-Rasset’s act of replacing her hard drive ethical?NO

13. The civil remedies of A. INJUCTION and B. DAMAGES are available to the owners of the copyrighted songs.

14. Would a court likely find Thomas-Rasset reliable for copyright infringement? YES

15. WHAT IF THE FACTS WERE DIFFERENT?What if Thomas-Rasset had not shared files, but rather used digital samplings in her college project presentation? Would that have possibly changed the result?YES

16. Why?A.Some courts have not found digital sampling illegal. B. Thomas-Rasset's use was fair use for educational purposes.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The following financial information applied to your company for 2018:
    11·1 answer
  • What do economists use to describe the amount of good?
    9·1 answer
  • The price of one country currency expressed in another country currency definition
    15·1 answer
  • A certificate of deposit often charges a penalty for withdrawing funds before the maturity date. If the penalty involves two mon
    13·1 answer
  • The features of Municipal bonds make them attractive to high income, _________ bracket investors. Multiple Choice Extra-tax Low-
    15·1 answer
  • Factory Overhead Rates, Entries, and Account Balance Sundance Solar Company operates two factories. The company applies factory
    10·1 answer
  • Why do people care about their social status?
    5·1 answer
  • Stacy purchased a stock last year and sold it today for $3 a share more than her purchase price. She received a total of $.75 in
    6·1 answer
  • Perfectly competitive markets are economically efficient in the long run, partly because Select one: a. entry barriers enable su
    14·1 answer
  • Employment law is the large body of laws, administrative rulings, and precedents that encompass all areas of the employer/employ
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!