Explanation:
It basically gives a false represention
-that smoking gun evidence is the only form of evidence that can prove something beyond reasonable doubt
-it makes people biased against criminals
Basically those are my thoughts but there are probably more
Answer:
whatever you want to do it again lol I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I
Answer:
Explanation:
The judge should allow it and overrule it. But regarding the evidence that they have of the plaintiff and dependent, maybe ask to see the medical bills and/or anything to prove that that actually happened
Judicial activism is the (assertion or somtimes the unjustified assertion) of the power of judicial review to set aside government acts. Judicial restraint is the refusal to strike down such acts, leaving the issue to ordinary politics
