One of the reasons why Iranian radicals took American hostages at the U.S. Embassy in 1979: the US government was providing medical care for the Shah and the iranians wanted to remove the existing iranian government, so it could not ally to the United States.
So, the correct answer is b)
Secularism was a social movement that separates religion from the ordinary life in the middle age. Secularism rejects religious ideas that once dominated the European medieval times, such as the focus on God in everything, human condemnation, and permanent praying or meditation.
Secularism initiated as a confrontation or reaction to religious ideas in the medieval times in Europe. People realized that the human being was very important and had values that should be respected by the monarchies. This made possible a better recognition of human achievements in culture and arts.
The influence that secularism had on the Renaissance over politics can be found in the works of Niccolo Machiavelli. The ideas he expressed in “The Prince” were of the utmost influence in the Renaissance and it still is a very influential book in today’s politics.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke also were part of political ideas during the Renaissance. Hobbes, with his theory of Social Contract, and Locke with his ideas in the Two Treatises of Government.
Answer:
<em>because</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>Chinese</em><em> </em><em>ppl</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em> </em><em>all</em><em> </em><em>right</em><em> </em><em>now</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em> </em><em>didnt</em><em> </em><em>get</em><em> </em><em>anything</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>do</em><em> </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>me</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>car</em><em> </em><em>lo</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>same</em><em> </em><em>place</em><em> </em><em>if</em><em> </em><em>she</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>watching</em><em> </em><em>6</em><em>her</em><em> </em><em>7</em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>8</em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>9</em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em> </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>9</em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>me</em><em> </em><em>nah</em><em> </em><em>9</em><em>if</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em> </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>no</em><em> </em><em>problem</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>not</em><em> </em>
Answer:
in France there was a very strong support of extreme right (this terms is quite broad and does not include so-called nazism) already before the Great War. After 1870 French extreme right became quite powerful and had a stimulating support of intellectuals (Barres, Maurras) who were able to stimulate new generations ...a big part of intellectual elite invited Mussolini´s coup and in 30s there was a hayday of French right. When Hitler came in poweŕ, he had a strong support among French. But French extreme-right was frequently more conservative than modern (nazism).
Explanation:
Jacques Doriot (leader and founder of PPF), writer Pierre Drieu la Rochelle, Robert Brasillach or Céline had many motives to support nazism. They believed in something that could be called "revolution of the body and instinct", the criticized democracy of the IIIrd republic because of its liberalism and intellectualism. They wanted strong leader and politics of body and instinct. But they were never united. In the government there was a division between "marchalistes" (followers of Pétain) and "lavalistes" (folloowers of pro-nazi laval).
