Aggregate demand will decrease by $900 billion.
The overall demand for finished goods and services in an economy at a certain period is known as aggregate demand (AD) or domestic final demand (DFD) in the field of macroeconomics. Effective demand is a common name for it, however other times this term is used to make a distinction. This is a country's demand for its gross domestic output. It details the volume of goods and services that will be bought at every price point. The aggregate demand is made up of investment, corporate and governmental expenditures, consumer spending, and net exports. Real output is represented on the horizontal axis and the price level is plotted on the vertical axis to represent the aggregate demand curve. Although it is presumed to be downward sloping, the Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu findings demonstrate that the curve's slope
To know more about aggregate demand refer to brainly.com/question/24777291
#SPJ4
Answer:
Date Particulars Debit Credit
Inventory 40,000
Accounts Payable - Gita 30,000
Bank 10,000
Accounts Receivable - Jeewan 7,000
Sales 7,000
Cost of Goods sold 10,000
Inventory 10,000
Accounts Payable - Gita 15,000
Discount Received 1,000
Cash 14,000
Cash 6,500
Discount Received 500
Accounts Receivable - Jeewan 7,000
Explanation:
It is required to record journal entries of given transactions. It is shown on the question that transactions includes purchase, sales, cash receipts and cash payment. The first transaction describe that business purchase goods from Gita while in second transaction it shows the business sold goods on Credit. The third transaction indicates business paid cash to accounts payable and received discount. The fourth transaction indicates that business received cash from Jeewan a Receivable and received discount from them.
False, while the supply of major film stars is small and relatively fixed in the short run, the demand for the average doctor or nurse is quite large globally. By stating that the marginal benefit of services provided by doctors and nurses is considerably lower than the marginal benefit of services provided by major film stars, the diamond-water paradox is illustrated. This suggests that while there is a greater demand than there is for major film stars, there is a greater supply of doctors and nurses.
The marginal utility that major movie stars provide to moviegoers is greater than the marginal utility that patients receive from doctors and nurses. This is due to the fact that people who use the services of well-known actors and actresses are more willing to pay for them than people who use the services of physicians and nurses. Though a person's health is more important to their quality of life than movies, consumers value movies more for their utility than their health, especially once they have achieved a basic level of sound health. This actually explains the "diamond water paradox," in which consumers are willing to pay more for valuable diamonds than they are for the water that sustains life. In plain English, people are more willing to value the satisfaction they get from watching one more movie than they are from receiving more medical attention. That implies that people only give basic healthcare needs a thought.
Note that the full question is:
Movie stars such as Salma Hayek, Samuel L. Jackson, Dwayne Johnson, and Jennifer Lawrence are paid millions of dollars per movie, which can take as much as 6 months of full-time work for an actor. By contrast, doctors and nurses earn considerably less over the same time period. Why might this be? While the supply of (major film stars OR doctors and nurses) is small and relatively fixed in the short run, the demand for (the average doctor or nurse OR movies featuring these film stars) is quite large globally. By contrast, the marginal benefit of the services provided by (major film stars OR doctors and nurses) is relatively low, although the total benefit is quite high. This illustrates the diamond-water paradox. True or False
Learn more about marginal utility brainly.com/question/15050855
#SPJ4
Answer:
number of pizza per our = 10
number of worker = 4
number of pizza per our per worker =2.5
Explanation:
