Answer:
No, it is not fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety.
Explanation:
No, it is not appropriate to let financial pressures ascertain how much we are willing to contribute to promoting justice and public security.
Spending on justice and public safety is an essential public expense, an expense that is needed to maintain the composition of our enlightened society. Let’s consider the example of a correctional institution. Such an institution works towards the restoration of offenders. These institutions have to struggle with unlawful justice bureaus for funding. They also have to struggle with social welfare divisions like education for funding.
Now correctional bureaus help in advancing justice and public safety. If funding is freed from the restraints of financial pressures then these bureaus will be necessary for supporting public security and supporting justice.
1629 executive orders have been made between the last six presidents
Answer:
small claims court handles cases involving property damage
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is not Title VIII of the 1972 Education Act that prohibits gender discrimination in all primary and secondary schools, colleges and universities that receive federal funds. Title IX determines this.
This title aims to promote gender equality throughout the country's education sector, allowing girls and boys to have the same chances and the same privileges in all phases of academic growth, not allowing one gender to be valued above the other.
