Answer:
Interrupted chain
Explanation:
The interrupted chain also called incidental teaching. This technique is used to increase the learning behavior by changing the environment and routine of a child. In this procedure when the child knows well about a step that is involved but the step is omitted from the procedure for a brief period.
For instance, if a mother told her daughter to make her breakfast and she makes breakfast by following the steps but one step is omitted for example rice is omitted. The omitted p[art is sabotaged.
Thus in the question, The therapist used this technique to make incidental learning for Paige.
Answer:
The Seneca Falls Convention was the first women's rights convention. It advertised itself as "a convention to discuss the social, civil, and religious condition and rights of woman". Held in the Wesleyan Chapel of the town of Seneca Falls, New York, it spanned two days over July 19–20, 1848. Attracting widespread attention, it was soon followed by other women's rights conventions, including the Rochester Women's Rights Convention in Rochester, New York, two weeks later. In 1850 the first in a series of annual National Women's Rights Conventions met in Worcester, Massachusetts.
Explanation:
Answer: Presenting the key is: Constructive delivery
Explanation:
Constructive delivery is done instead of or in a place of actual,real delivery it symbolises what is being delivered without practical delivering it. Constructive delivery symbolises the fact that someone has received ownership of what is being represented by the key for instant.
It is more common where property or possession ownership is being transferred to someone else.
Answer:
The 2.8 million-year-old specimen is 400,000 years older than researchers thought that our kind first emerged.
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
