Answer:
The correct answer is: Stablishing the tests validity.
Explanation:
Establishing the tests validity is understood as the act of evaluating whether a particular test measures what it says it mesures.
It is the most important criteria in establishing the quality of a test.
A test that has not been proved to have validity is obsolete and its results are unnecesary.
In this particular case, Dr. Chu developed a spatial reasoning test. She is then comparing the scores on her test with the scores and grades of students enrolled in courses that involve spatial reasoning.
In this instance, Dr. Chu is in the process of Stablishing the tests validity.
Answer:
I have the same question need an answer asap
Explanation:
Answer: I wouldn't include many things because i live in rich neighborhood!
Explanation:
Defendants who are actively hallucinating and experiencing delusions during the time of their trials are most likely to be "committed for treatment until they improve enough to defend themselves."
A defendant is a man blamed for perpetrating a wrongdoing in criminal indictment or a man against whom some kind of common alleviation is being looked for in a common case.
In a criminal trial, a defendant is a man denounced (charged) of carrying out an offense (a wrongdoing; a demonstration characterized as culpable under criminal law). The other party to a criminal preliminary is typically an open prosecutor, yet in a few locales, private arraignments are permitted.
Criminal defendants are regularly arrested by police and brought under the steady gaze of a court under a capture warrant. Criminal defendants are normally obliged to post safeguard before being discharged from custody.
That is really up to you. What would you add to it? I don't think there is really a right or wrong answer to that.
