Answer:
Overlapping claims by the French, the British, and the Spanish created fierce competition between the three European nations. Look at Benjamin Franklin's political cartoon from 1754.Explanation:
Territorial expansion remained popular with the U.S. public, as did the idea of spreading republican government. Many pro-slavery Southerners sought to expand southwards, allowing for more territory where slavery could continue to grow and expand.
Human Sacrifices is the act of killing one or more humans, usually as an offering to a deity, as part of a ritual. Human sacrifice has been practiced in various cultures throughout history.
I mean.
They're both in history and ''practiced''.
Though a connection, no, Territorial expansion went along with slavery. The act of killing another human being is not very humane nor a connection. Slavery deals with principles of property law are applied to them, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property. A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Human Sacrifices deal with people who have really no choice and are dead either way, victims were typically ritually killed in a manner that was supposed to please or appease gods, spirits or the deceased. Slavery doesn't deal with death. So, no.
The original split in Islam and the one that has the biggest impact on the community today is the Shia-Sunni division, which is based on the difference on who should be the successor of Muhammad: only Ali (Shia) or Abu Bakr (Sunni)
If they do not win the majority of the electoral votes
