All categories

3 years ago

Paul, Ringo, or George might plays at the wedding? What is wrong with this sentence

English

2 answers:

Daniel [21]3 years ago

5 0

The spelling, word play, and punctuation. are incorrect. Here's how it should be.

"Paul, Ringo, And George might play at the wedding."

Margaret [11]3 years ago

3 0

Answer / Explanation:

In The Sentence “Paul, Ringo, Or George Might Plays At The Wedding,” Plays Is Incorrect Because…? a. the sentence omits "John" and thus is a fragment. ... "Paul, Ringo, or George" is a plural subject and does not agree with the third person singular "s" on "plays".

You might be interested in

Write an application to the principal of your school;

Sphinxa [80]

To,

The Principal

GGHS Murree

Respected Madam,

With all due respect I beg to say that my father has got promotion and now he is moving to US and we are also going with him. I would like to inform you that I have to leave the school as I will be shifting there and will continue my studies there. I request you to give me a leaving certificate so I can continue my admission process there. I shall be really thankful to you.

Yours Obediently,

Ghazala

7th Grade

To,

The Principal

GGHS Murree

Respected Madam,

I hereby request you to kindly issue a Character certificate for me. My Class is ............. and Admission Number-........... since I have already discussed the whole issue with concerned authority. I take this opportunity to thank you and the staff members for the kind cooperation and support given to me during my past academic year. I wish all the success to your organization.

Thanking You

Yours Faithfully

Student Name

Class

Roll Number

8 0

3 years ago

Plz see the picture and plz give me the right answer plz..!

NikAS [45]

Answer:

a)2

b)2

c)3

d)3

e)1

Your attachment is not clear tho

Explanation:

Have a nice day

8 0

3 years ago

Which of these statements expresses the most positive connotation? A) Mr. Langley asked the boys to take their seats. B) Mr. Lan

garik1379 [7]

A. Mr langley asked the boys to take their seats

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are some facts about the NAACP

nikklg [1K]

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is a civil rights organization in the United States, formed in 1909 as a bi-racial organization to advance justice for African Americans by W. E. B. 
Founded: February 12, 1909
CEO: Cornell William Brooks (May 17, 2014–)
Headquarters: Baltimore, MD
Budget: 27.62 million USD
Founders: W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells, Mary White Ovington, More
Leaders: Roslyn Brock, Cornell William Brooks

Founded in 1909, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was one of the earliest and most influential civil rights organization in the United States. During its early years, the NAACP focused on legal strategies designed to confront the critical civil rights issues of the day.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was founded in 1909-1910 in New York City by a group of white and black intellectuals. United in their opposition to the gradualism preached by Booker T. Washington, the NAACP leaders sought, first, to make whites aware of the need for racial equality. To do this, the organization launched a program of speechmaking, lobbying, and publicizing the issue. It also started a magazine, the Crisis, which was edited for years by the black leader W. E. B. Du Bois. At the same time, the NAACP attacked segregation and racial inequality through the courts. It won a Supreme Court decision in 1915 against the grandfather clause (used by many southern states to prevent blacks from voting) and another in 1927 against the all-white primary.

Did You Know?Founded in 1909, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) today has approximately 425,000 members.

4 0

3 years ago

HELP ME ASAP 20 POINTS FOR CORRECT ANSWER

lilavasa [31]

We may never know what comes in the future but I believe it is alright to try to shape it to have the best outcome possible. There is no better way to try and shape the future than setting goals. The main type of goals I will support are long term goals that will land you in your dream job. Even though long term goals might stress you out, it is very important to set goals for the future so you know what to aim for at each step of the way to your dream job. Even with counterclaims such as goals being too stressful, the is barely to no evidence to prove that so I believe setting goals is the right choice.

When setting goals, your are likely to have a bigger chance for success as demonstrated in a 2015 study by psychologist Gail Matthews that showed when people wrote down their goals, they were 33 percent more successful in achieving them than those who formulated outcomes in their head. Along with this, your goals for landing in your dream job will be the target to aim for. Without goals you might stumble upon more problems than when you have established goals to aim for. The difference between setting goals and formulating the outcome in your head is like setting up a target to shoot in a shooting range and just imagining a target. Obviously, you would be more successful when actually setting up a target. The same applies with goals, you are more successful when you actually set a goal.

Even with reason alone, you could infer that setting goals would most likely land you in your dream job. With goals you know what to shoot for and know how to get there. For example, if you want to become a doctor, your goals might be to complete an undergraduate education, pass MCAT examination, apply for medical school, and etc. Therefore, with these actually goals you can succeed in becoming a doctor because you know what to aim for. In addition to all the evidence, studies have shown that goals can motivate you and organize the path towards success.

Some counterclaims against goals are mostly based on feelings and not actually evidence. One example of this is the counterclaim that goals are too strict and don't give enough wiggle room. This is false because when setting goals, how you reach them is completely on how you want to reach them. Another counterclaim is that goals are too stressful and not worthwhile. This is also false due to the fact that you will have a higher success rate when setting goals and again, how stressful the goals might be is up to you.

Overall it is best to have goals set in stone to allow your self to succeed. One important factor is that goals are PROVEN to higher your success rate. Also if you don't set goals, you could be doing something wrong which could eventually affect your success in getting your dream job. If you use your reasoning skills you could infer that setting goals is the right way to go. Even though there are counterclaims, they are wrong because they are based on feelings and not actual evidence. If you set goals you can achieve anything with enough time.

HOPE THIS HELPS!!

4 0

3 years ago