States with a greater population send more electors to the electoral college - this statement best indicates how the Electoral College benefits small states most.
<h3>What is Electoral College?</h3>
The United States Electoral College is the group of presidential electors required by the Constitution to form every four years for the sole purpose of appointing the president and vice president. The Electoral College does give disproportionate mathematical weight to small states. But its goofy structure means almost all of them are ignored in presidential politics. Almost every state gives all of its electoral votes to whoever wins the state allowing candidates to take the votes of strongly partisan states for granted. Indeed, it's actively foolish to campaign where you are guaranteed to win or lose only the swing states matter.
The correct answer is option D.
Learn more about Electoral College, refer:
brainly.com/question/18750900
#SPJ4
Answer:
The 8th amendment
Explanation:
Prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment
Answer:
D
Explanation:
It technically could be A, B, and C
Answer:
<h3>
I couldn't really understand your question... but this is what I came up with</h3>
T.L.O. was a 14-year-old female student at a New Jersey high school. A teacher found T.L.O. and another student smoking cigarettes in the girls’ restroom in the school building in violation of school rules. The teacher brought the two students to a school administrator, who questioned each of them. The second student admitted to smoking cigarettes. T.L.O. denied the allegations. The administrator then accused T.LO. of lying to him, and demanded to see her purse in an attempt to find the cigar
Answer:
1. "Loose lips sink ships." Share certain information can jeopardize OpSec, and result in advantages for enemy troops.
2. 1A should protect ALL speech. censoring specific words is a form of bias. People should instead be taught coping skills when presented with ideas they find objectionable. "Hate speech" presumes there is a speaker and a listener. The speaker can share anything he likes. The listener is the regulated party. When presented with objectionable ideas, he has choices: he can choose the respond calmly and reasonably; he can respond with aggression; or, he can ignore it and walk away.
