Your answer is D. both participant and leader
Answer:
The Correlation analysis “R” is measured to compute the strength of relationship among variables. Moreover, the value of correlation is calculated among -1 to +1. Which implies that if the computed value is near to -1 then there will be strong but negative relation and if near to +1 then it is strong but relation among the variable. However zero is consider as neutral point.
A. The computed value of correlation is - 0.772. The value identifies that that there is a strong but negative association among the variables (GDP and infant mortality rate).
B. The correlation analysis cannot computed among the variables continent and GDP because "continent" is a categorical variable not quantitative.
C. The computed value of correlation is higher than 1. Thus, the statement implies that there is a very strong relationship among life expectancy and GDP which is incorrect. As the association cannot be higher than 1.
D. There is a strong relationship among literacy rate and GDP as the relationship is nearer to 1. Furthermore, the association among literacy rate and GDP doesn’t suggest the causation.
E. The computed correlation among the variables is 0.90. Which indicated that the variables goes up. That is, when the GDP goes down the import is also decrease and when GDP increases the import increases Thus, the there is a positive correlation.
The amount of overhead allocated to a job that used 300 direct labor hours is $900.
<h3>Overhead allocated:</h3>
First step is to calculate the predetermined overhead rate per direct labor hour
Using this formula
Predetermined overhead rate=Estimated manufacturing overhead/Estimated direct labor hours
Predetermined overhead rate=$450,000/150,000
Second step is to calculate the overhead allocated
Overhead allocated=Predetermined overhead rate × Direct labor hours
Overhead allocated=$3×300
Overhead allocated=$900
Inconclusion the amount of overhead allocated to a job that used 300 direct labor hours is $900.
Learn more about overhead allocated here:brainly.com/question/15739613
Answer:
The answer is: C) There is a valid contract
Explanation:
According to Appellate Court ruling in Steinberg v. Chicago Medical School;
The two parties (Joe and Sate University) entered a valid contract agreement upon receiving the $100 dollar application fee from Joe. State University´s catalog is considered to be the Offer part of this contract and the $100 application fee is considered the Consideration part of the contract.
Answer: c. They would do better charging $15 than $10.
Explanation:
It is given that Max and Maddy total cost of car parking remains the same, that is it does not matter whether they have seven or five cars parked on their lawn. So, since total cost is constant, Max and Maddy's decision would depend on total revenue.
Total revenue from charging, $10 is $70,
Total revenue from charging $15 is $75.
Since, total cost is constant, Max and Maddy will choose to charge $15 since it is giving them $5 more.
