Answer:
<u><em>A universal law</em></u>.
Kant says that when trying to decide whether an action is morally permissible, we must ask if we can consistently will that the maxim of our action should become <u><em>a universal law.</em></u>
Explanation:
The moral concept in Kant drives from the idea of the universal law. According to him, humans must consider if their actions are good or bad if implies and are toward the world. If it is good for the world, it is morally acceptable. On the contrary, just forget. It's pretty simple on the surface, but when we analyze deeply we can see that moral is a complicated concept that is not easy to measure.
<span>The answer you always assume is, "yes". This process is based on an adaption of a decision making process which was developed by Dr. William Glasser, which is a six step process asking the questions, What's my current situation? How do I want my situation to be? Do I have a choice here? What are the possible choices? What's the most likely outcome of each possible choice? and which choice am I going to commit to making?</span>
The correct answer for this question is
Answer:
The can be found <em>guilty but mentally ill.</em>
Explanation:
<u>Guilty but mentally ill is a (GBMI)</u> is <u>a form of verdict applied to an individual who has committed a crime and has been found guilty, while the court also acknowledges that this person is mentally ill.</u>
While this approach to the prosecution of people with mental illnesses receives criticism it has been the first introduced in Michigan in 1982 in order to reduce the risk of growing insanity acquittals court decisions.
