One occurrence where neighborhood Sub-Saharan societies opposed absorption with Islam is the distinction in sex standards. Because numerous Africans had changed over to Islam, they didn't utilize precisely the same as Southwest Asia. Ladies did not shroud themselves or wear the hijab in Africa since they didn't see it as a religious necessity. The same can be said for associations with unmarried men and ladies. In Africa, this did not make a difference, but rather in Southwest Asia, they were to be isolated.
Hi, thank you for posting your query here in Brainly. I hope I would be able to help you with this problem.
Just like in any kind of problem solving method, the first step in the military problem solving method is identifying the problem. This step is very essential because you must know the problem before even finding ways to solve it.
Answer:
A population with a low literacy rate is less likely to have access to health education, which would be used to develop preventative health practices. A population with a low literacy rate usually performs unskilled labor for low wages and therefore has less income and access to healthcare. A nation with a low literacy rate is also less likely to have a stable government with the economic resources to provide infrastructure, sanitation, and healthcare. Finally, a population with a low literacy rate is more likely to have a rapidly growing population. This contributes to the spread of disease because it is harder for the government to provide adequate healthcare services to exploding populations.
Answer: $30, $3, $40, $70, $90, $90, $80
Explanation:
Answer: a. The McCain-Feingold Act violates freedom of speech.
Explanation:
Issue ads refer to a scenario where a candidate is named or discussed in relation to an issue without however, supporting or decampaigning an opponent.
This was restricted after the McCain-Feingold act of 2002. The Act restricted the use of Issue Ads within <em>30 days of a primary election or 60 days of a general election </em>for a person running for any Federal Office<em> </em>if the broadcast cost more than $10,000.
The Supreme Court ruled in its decision that unless the ad was expressly supporting or decampaigning a candidate, it should be exempted from the Act. The decision of the Court was also noteworthy as the Court declared it was against greater regulation of political speech.
A supporter of this Act would therefore probably seize upon this last part and say that the Act violates freedom of speech.
