Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

8

Our environment is very sensitive to the amount of ozone in the upper atmosphere. The level of ozone normally found is 7.5 parts

/million (ppm). A researcher believes that the current ozone level is not at a normal level. The mean of 16 samples is 7.8 ppm with a standard deviation of 0.8. Assume the population is normally distributed. A level of significance of 0.01 will be used. Make the decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

1 answer:

DochEvi [55]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

We accept H₀ with the information we have, we can say level of ozone is under the major limit

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Distribution

population mean = μ₀ = 7.5 ppm

Sample size n = 16 df = n - 1 df = 15

Sample mean = μ = 7.8 ppm

Sample standard deviation = s = 0.8

We want to find out if ozono level, is above normal level that is bigger than 7.5

1.- Hypothesis Test

null hypothesis H₀ μ₀ = 7.5

alternative hypothesis Hₐ μ₀ > 7.5

2.-Significance level α = 0.01 we will develop one tail-test (right)

then for df = 15 and α = 0,01 from t -student table we get

t(c) = 2.624

3.-Compute t(s)

t(s) = ( μ - μ₀ ) / s /√n ⇒ t(s) = ( 7.8 - 7.5 )*4/0.8

t(s) = 0.3*4/0.8

t(s) = 1.5

4.-Compare t(s) and t(c)

t(s) < t(c) 1.5 < 2.64

Then t(s) is inside the acceptance region. We accept H₀

You might be interested in

Let f(x,y,z) = ztan-1(y2) i + z3ln(x2 + 1) j + z k. find the flux of f across the part of the paraboloid x2 + y2 + z = 3 that li

Sophie [7]

Consider the closed region $V$ bounded simultaneously by the paraboloid and plane, jointly denoted $S$ . By the divergence theorem,

$\displaystyle\iint_S\mathbf f(x,y,z)\cdot\mathrm dS=\iiint_V\nabla\cdot\mathbf f(x,y,z)\,\mathrm dV$

And since we have

$\nabla\cdot\mathbf f(x,y,z)=1$

the volume integral will be much easier to compute. Converting to cylindrical coordinates, we have

$\displaystyle\iiint_V\nabla\cdot\mathbf f(x,y,z)\,\mathrm dV=\iiint_V\mathrm dV$
$=\displaystyle\int_{\theta=0}^{\theta=2\pi}\int_{r=0}^{r=1}\int_{z=2}^{z=3-r^2}r\,\mathrm dz\,\mathrm dr\,\mathrm d\theta$
$=\displaystyle2\pi\int_{r=0}^{r=1}r(3-r^2-2)\,\mathrm dr$
$=\dfrac\pi2$

Then the integral over the paraboloid would be the difference of the integral over the total surface and the integral over the disk. Denoting the disk by $D$ , we have

$\displaystyle\iint_{S-D}\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm dS=\frac\pi2-\iint_D\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm dS$

Parameterize $D$ by

$\mathbf s(u,v)=u\cos v\,\mathbf i+u\sin v\,\mathbf j+2\,\mathbf k$
$\implies\mathbf s_u\times\mathbf s_v=u\,\mathbf k$

which would give a unit normal vector of $\mathbf k$ . However, the divergence theorem requires that the closed surface $S$ be oriented with outward-pointing normal vectors, which means we should instead use $\mathbf s_v\times\mathbf s_u=-u\,\mathbf k$ .

Now,

$\displaystyle\iint_D\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm dS=\int_{u=0}^{u=1}\int_{v=0}^{v=2\pi}\mathbf f(x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v))\cdot(-u\,\mathbf k)\,\mathrm dv\,\mathrm du$
$=\displaystyle-4\pi\int_{u=0}^{u=1}u\,\mathrm du$
$=-2\pi$

So, the flux over the paraboloid alone is

$\displaystyle\iint_{S-D}\mathbf f\cdot\mathrm dS=\frac\pi2-(-2\pi)=\dfrac{5\pi}2$

6 0

3 years ago

Identify the percent of change as an increase or decrease. Then find the percent of change, rounding to the nearest tenth of a p

kap26 [50]

Answer:

-60% decrease

Step-by-step explanation:

60 is the old value and 24 is the new value.

percent change = $\frac{new - old}{|old|}$ x 100%

so for this problem, you can substitute the values given in the formula:

percent change = $\frac{60-24}{|60|}$ x 100% = $\frac{-36}{60}$ x 100% =

-60% (decrease)

3 0

3 years ago

Given f(x) = 6(1-X), what is the value of f(8)?

andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

-42

Step-by-step explanation:

f(8)=6(1-8)

because of that 1-8 is -7 so you times by 6 and get -42

8 0

2 years ago

50 POINTS please help!<br> quickly<br><br> What is the value of sinX?

Oksanka [162]

Answer letter B. 5 45 / 41

5 0

3 years ago

Please help asap :DDD

Musya8 [376]

X< 5 and (- infinity, 5 )

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers