Djsinshdbd I don’t have one ;-; lol
if the slope "m" and the y-intercept "b" are both 0, then the slope-intercept form of it could just be written as
y = 0x + 0
which of course is just y = 0.
now, is (-1,0) on the line y = -4x -1?
well, to find the other coordinate, we can simply plug in the known coordinate value, say hmmm if we set x = -1, do we get 0 for "y"? let's check
y = -4(-1) - 1
y = 3.................................. for the point (-1, 3)
whatever happened to Margo? well, we gather she used x = 0, y = -4(0) - 1, y = -1, and that gives the point (0, -1) NOT (-1, 0).
so her mistake is, she used the y-coordinate value of 0 and used it on the "x" value to get the -1.l
however (-1, 0) is not on the line, but (0, -1) is.
Answer:
76.8
Step-by-step explanation:
40/250 = 0.16 (1 campers vote)
0.16 x 12 = 1.92
1.92 x 40 = 76.8
<span>0.74596656701 is the answer ma'am!</span>
Answer:
m<0 = 50
Step-by-step explanation:
The opposite angles in an isosceles trapezoid are equal, so <T = <A
and <B = <O
We know the sum of all 4 angles has to be 360 since it is a quadrilateral
<T+<A + < B + <O = 360
Substituting what we know, and what we want to know
<T+ <T + <O <+O = 360
Combining like terms
2<T + 2 <0 = 360
2( 130) + 2<0 = 360
260 + 2< O = 360
Subtract 260 from each side
260-260 + 2< O = 360-260
2<O = 100
Divide by 2
2/2<O = 100/2
<0 = 50