Answer:
B $4.90
Explanation:
The earnings per share ratio (EPS), is an entities net income after tax that is available the shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock that are outstanding during the period of the earnings.
As such, given;
net income after tax = $490,000
number of shares = 100,000
EPS = net income after tax/number of shares
= $490,000/100,000
= $4.90
Answer:
B) The State Disability Insurance (SDI) program benefits received for a period of disability are not taxable as income, but benefits received for time off under the Paid Family Leave program are federally taxable as income.
Explanation:
Disability insurance benefits are not reported for tax purposes with one exception. If a person are receiving unemployment insurance benefits,
become unable to work due to a disability, and begin receiving disability insurance benefits, your disability insurance benefits are considered a substitution for your unemployment insurance benefits, and will then be reported for tax purposes.
If disability insurance benefits are reported, a notice will accompany the first benefit payment sent to you advising that the benefits are being reported to the Internal Revenue Service. The employment development department will provide you with a 1099G tax form in January showing the reported amounts paid and forward a copy to the Internal Revenue Service.
Paid family leave benefits are reported for federal purposes but not state tax purposes.
Paid family leave benefits are not taxable or reported to the California State Franchise Tax Board.
Answer:
The <em>covenant of good faith and fair dealing</em> simply requires all the parties to a contract to deal in an even-handed manner such that one party's action does not frustrate the other or prevent the other from getting the benefits of that contract.
In insurance, this covenant is sometimes captured under the heading <em>Uberrima fides</em>. This is a Latin phrase meaning <em>"Utmost Good Faith".</em>
In insurance, this covenant is legally binding on all parties to ensure they each reveal every information that is material to the acceptance or rejection of the risk (on the part of the Insurer) whilst on the part of the Insured the insurer is required to be explicit regarding the terms of the policy as well as the calculations by which the premium is arrived at.
For example, if an Insurance company is looking at covering someone under it's Life Insurance Policy, the person taking out the contract must disclose whether or not the Insured has any latent health issues which might shorten their lifespan. If there is such a condition, the Insurance company may still take on the risk albeit at a relatively higher rate than a client without such medical conditions.
An Insurance Company may breach this covenant if they delay or refuse to reasonable settle claims due to the Insured. It may also arise if the Insurance company by some technical manipulation intentionally under settles an Insurance claim.
If for instance, a Comprehensive Insurance Policy files a valid claim, the Insurer may be liable for negligence and or intentional wrongdoing.
Cheers!
