Answer: The chances of occurrence of tail when we toss the coin is 50% which can be explained by the following formula:
Probability = Number of favorable events / # of Total event
Here the number of Total events = 2^3 =8
Number of total events can also be found by following Way:
1. Head, Head, Head
2. Head, Head, Tail
3. Head, Tail, Tail
4. Tail, Tail, Tail
5. Tail, Tail, Head
6. Tail, Head, Head
7. Head, Tail, Head
8. Tail, Head, Tail
This implies
Number of favorable events = 1 & Number of Total events = 8
By putting values:
Probability = 1 / 8 = 12.5%
So the chances of winning $10 is 12.5% whereas loosing $2 is 87.5%.
Answer is A. Debt. Or possibly revenue
<em />I think it is C but don't quote me on it.
The answer is:
(1) who had the name first
(2) whether there would be confusion in the market as to which company was which
(3) whether the name was so well known that it would instantly be associated with one of the companies
who first had the name need to be considered in order to obtain legal ownership of the domain. Finding out whether the name is already familiar in the market is being done in order to ensure that company's effort is not falsely accredited to another company.
Answer: Yes, although the salesperson did not make any express warranties, the UCC imposes an implied warranty of merchantability under which the rotisserie is guaranteed to be fit for the ordinary purposes for which it is used.
Explanation:
From the information given, we can infer that Mason has a recourse. Even though the salesperson did not make any express warranties, it should be noted that the UCC imposes an implied warranty of merchantability and hence, the rotisserie will be guaranteed to be fit for the purposes ordinarily for which it is used.
Therefore, the correct option will be D.
