Answer:
The correct answer is (C) structural assimilation
Due to the greatest cost of goods sold, the LIFO (Last In Last Out) technique displays the lowest net profitability. Compared to the other techniques of inventory valuation, the cost of goods sold for the LIFO approach is the greatest.
<h3>Which technique of inventory valuation will result in the lowest net profit?</h3>
The application of LIFO will produce the lowest net income and the greatest estimated cost of goods sold among the three options during periods of inflation.
<h3>Which method of inventory has the lowest income tax rate?</h3>
LIFO is the inventory cost flow method that yields the lowest income tax liability. A form of inventory cost flow mechanism called last-in-first-out (LIFO) operates under the presumption that the last item acquired will be the first item to be sold.
<h3>In an era of inflation, which inventory method results in the lowest income tax?</h3>
Due to increasing COGS, LIFO leads to reduced net income (and taxes). However, under LIFO during inflation, there are fewer inventory write-downs. Results from average cost are in the middle of FIFO and LIFO.
To Know more about techniques
brainly.com/question/13655064
#SPJ4
The statement “Expenses, such as depreciation on buildings
are also known as variable expenses.”, is false, due to the fact that depreciation
is a fixed cost since throughout its useful life as an asset, it reoccurs in
the same amount per period, and thus, depreciation cannot be considered a
variable cost. Nevertheless, as with all things, there is an exception. The
depreciation will be sustained in a pattern that is more consistent with a
variable expense, only if a business recruits a usage-based depreciation methodology.
To add, the corporate expense that alters with the company’s
production output is called the variable cost.
C because when you want something less they make it cheaper hoping you’ll want it more. McDonald’s coffee is cheaper then Starbucks making it a bargain and poor people want it
P(t) = (0.83)t^(5/4)
<span>2096 - 2015 = 81 </span>
<span>81 ^ (5/4) = 243 </span>
<span>243 × 0.83 = 201.69 </span>
<span>Population in 2096 expected to be 202 million.</span>
