Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
we have the expression:

To factor this expression we need to indentify the components that are common in both terms.
At first glance there is nothing in common, but we can notice that 30 and 70 are multiples of 10, that is:

so we can substitute this into the expression:

and now that we have the common term (the number 10) we can factorize it, that is, take out the common term and include a parentheses:

Answer:



Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Optimizing With Derivatives
</u>
The procedure to optimize a function (find its maximum or minimum) consists in
:
- Produce a function which depends on only one variable
- Compute the first derivative and set it equal to 0
- Find the values for the variable, called critical points
- Compute the second derivative
- Evaluate the second derivative in the critical points. If it results positive, the critical point is a minimum, if it's negative, the critical point is a maximum
We know a cylinder has a volume of 4
. The volume of a cylinder is given by

Equating it to 4

Let's solve for h

A cylinder with an open-top has only one circle as the shape of the lid and has a lateral area computed as a rectangle of height h and base equal to the length of a circle. Thus, the total area of the material to make the cylinder is

Replacing the formula of h

Simplifying

We have the function of the area in terms of one variable. Now we compute the first derivative and equal it to zero

Rearranging

Solving for r

![\displaystyle r=\sqrt[3]{\frac{4}{\pi }}\approx 1.084\ feet](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20r%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B%5Cpi%20%7D%7D%5Capprox%201.084%5C%20feet)
Computing h

We can see the height and the radius are of the same size. We check if the critical point is a maximum or a minimum by computing the second derivative

We can see it will be always positive regardless of the value of r (assumed positive too), so the critical point is a minimum.
The minimum area is


Answer:
yes it is
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
=> 
=> 
=> 
=> 
Answer:
No, the reason is because -3/4 is farther away from 0 on the number line while -1/4 is closer to 0. Therefore, -1/4 > -3/4 is the correct answer
Step-by-step explanation: