1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Setler [38]
4 years ago
13

What were some consequences of the California Gold Rush?

History
2 answers:
MariettaO [177]4 years ago
8 0
<span>Oregon Territory acquired by the U.S Texas Revolution Mexican War U.S expands</span>
torisob [31]4 years ago
6 0

The discovery of gold and the ensuing stampede to the mines reduced California's Indian population (by far the majority in 1845) from around 150,000 to 30,000 in a single decade, due to disease, dislocation, starvation, and outright murder. (White crimes against native peoples were sometimes regretted, never punished.)

The economy of California transformed from cattle (for  Mexican rancheros) and hunter/gathering (for many of the native peoples) to a full-blown mix of mining, agriculture, and transportation in the same time frame. California's industrial imports spurred economies in developed countries and drew off excess population from areas that were having a hard time (like Ireland, Canton, and  European countries that suffered violent counter-revolutions after 1848).

In addition to Northerners and Southerners from the U.S., Chinese, Irish, Chilean, Sonoran, Australian, French, English, Italian, and German immigrants left their homelands for California. Thanks to the invention of the steamship (which made passage around the Horn relatively safe and affordable) and the discovery of gold, California became an instant cultural kaleidoscope, with over a quarter of a million people pouring in during the first 3 years of the Gold Rush. This was unprecedented in human history.

The inclusion of California as a (nominally) Free State was strictly attributable to the Gold Rush. California's entry wildly exacerbated tensions between the North and South and came within a hair of triggering a civil war in 1850. Secession conventions held during the crisis laid the political groundwork for the South's later withdrawal from the Union in '60 and '61. (Ironically, the state government of California fell into Southern hands right away and largely stayed there through the 1850's. John C. Calhoun, who gave his dying speech against California's entry, need not have bothered his frosty locks at all.)

The discovery of gold created California's modern economy, funded the credit system that ensured Union victory in the Civil War, and triggered the building of the transcontinental railroad in the 1860's. This latter rocketed U.S. expansion into the West forward by decades and spelled the utter ruin of the Californian Indians and the speeded the downfall of tribes along the emigration routes to the West.

The Gold Rush is the defining moment in California history. Everything that has happened subsequently has taken place in its shadow.

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements best characterizes farming in the Sahara?
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

I am guessing B is the best answer

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the articles of confederation?
Nikolay [14]

Answer:

The articles of confederation established the functions of the national government of the United States after they declared independence from Great Britain

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
During the American Revolution, Benjamin Franklin was MOST instrumental in which of these?
notka56 [123]
Where are the options?
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLZ!!
baherus [9]

Answer: Yes the US should have gone to war. There are two sides to the topic, Yes and No. Yes because if we did not go to war with mexico we would not own all the present 50 states. No because war is expensive.

Explanation:

So for Yes you could write. The United States should have gone to war with mexico because, if they didn't then the United states would not be what it is today. A second reason is we needed the resources they had on there territory.

For no you could write. The United States should not have gone to war with mexico because, war is expensive for ammo and troops, a second reason is it was expensive for allies and reinforcements, and shipment.

6 0
4 years ago
What does the term “gender” mean?
Simora [160]

Answer:

a similar category of human beings that is outside the male/female binary classification and is based on the individual's personal awareness or identity plus many more genders

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did andrew jackson accomplish as president?
    12·1 answer
  • What was Gran Colombia? What hopes did Simon Bolivar have for this alliance?
    13·1 answer
  • Why is the United States considered a federal system
    10·2 answers
  • Which is a central concept in Buddhism?
    6·2 answers
  • What were the weaknesses of the present system of government under the articles of confederation that was implied by Hamilton?
    10·1 answer
  • What happened to the French ,Spanish, and British claims as a result of the treaty of Paris of 1763?
    8·1 answer
  • Based on what you have read, select each group below whose equal rights were ensured by the Civil Rights Act.
    8·1 answer
  • Why did American colonists come to oppose English rule in the 1760s and 1770s?
    12·1 answer
  • Explica y desarrolla como era el gobierno de la República Romana.<br><br> es para hoy ayuda :(
    8·1 answer
  • 1. How did the geographical features of the Suez Canal contribute to international conflict during the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!