CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLZ!!

1 answer:

6 0

Answer: Yes the US should have gone to war. There are two sides to the topic, Yes and No. Yes because if we did not go to war with mexico we would not own all the present 50 states. No because war is expensive.

Explanation:

So for Yes you could write. The United States should have gone to war with mexico because, if they didn't then the United states would not be what it is today. A second reason is we needed the resources they had on there territory.

For no you could write. The United States should not have gone to war with mexico because, war is expensive for ammo and troops, a second reason is it was expensive for allies and reinforcements, and shipment.

You might be interested in

In what other ways did the environment influence traditional architecture?

kow [346]

Biden gassssssssssssssw

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 1889, what popular monarch was overthrown by the military?

Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

<em>The Proclamation of the Republic </em>

Explanation:

The group overthrew the constitutional monarchy of the Empire of Brazil and ended the reign of Emperor Pedro II. <em>Proclamation</em> established the First Brazilian Republic on 15 November 1889.

8 0

3 years ago

What city in the US was the first Capital.

Marina86 [1]

Answer:

New York City

Explanation:

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2. What did the United States have to prove to Russia in the space race?

Ivan

Answer:

the united states effectively "won" the space race, which symbolized the defeat of communism and the end of the cold war

Explanation:

7 0

4 years ago

What does the Artical IV ensure

PolarNik [594]

Answer:

Article IV addresses something different: the states' relations with each other, sometimes called “horizontal federalism.” Its first section, the Full Faith and Credit Clause, requires every state, as part of a single nation, to give a certain measure of respect to every other state's laws and institutions.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago