Critical thinking refers to the ability to establish reflective reasoning in the most diverse situations, allowing the individual to make specific observations that help him to reach concrete and precise conclusions.
Critical thinking is a skill and as such it must be stimulated constantly, so that the practice in reasoning and reflection is increasingly improved. It is favorable that this stimulation is carried out since the individual is a child, so that in adulthood there is no problem getting used to complex and intricate concepts. One way to stimulate this type of racism is through reading, which manages to force the brain to think, unravel problems, create arguments and ideas.
Therefore, we can conclude that critical reasoning empowers the individual, who can quickly discern right and wrong things regardless of the environment in which he finds himself, thus preventing him from being deceived or lubricated at any time in his life.
Answer:
This is FALSE.
Explanation:
Each piece of writing does have a title or sub-title. But, it is not correct to infer the context of the piece based purely on the title. Because the whole text would provide more detailed information on the given heading. It would elaborate different or related aspects of the given title.
So, to properly understand the whole writing, it is not correct to conclude the meaning of the writing depending solely on what the title is.
Answer:
1st part -- "in the palace"
2nd part -- "to an old tower"
Explanation:
"in the palace" reveals that she's actually in the palace (at first)
"to an old tower" reveals that she's then goes to the actual old tower, where she finds that old lady there
these two parts helps readers know that so far, she's not gone out of the palace, such as to the forest
