1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksano4ka [1.4K]
3 years ago
8

What’s the answer? :) A? B? C? D?

Mathematics
2 answers:
kondor19780726 [428]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1st of all- (OFF TOPIC) you are on canvas lol

2nd- not sure, maybe B or C. Sorry if it is wrong, and I hope I could help.

Ket [755]3 years ago
8 0
B
Cause one input has to different number of output
You might be interested in
PLS I NEED HELP I GIVE ALL POINTS I HAVE!! :( In 1984 the average American ate 55.7 pounds of chicken. This was 2.8 pounds more
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer: Production in 2007 reached more than. 91.5 billion pounds. ... billion pounds, with chicken production totaling 36.6 ... Average Annual Per Capita Consumption (in pounds). 0.0. 10.0 ... 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006. Year ... half (55 percent) of all meat consumed are red meat.

simplfying to get 19.8928571429

then you mul·ti·ple equals 155.96

then you subtract and it gets you 52.9

then you add gets you 58.5.

This question is quite simple as long as you know how to do math you should ace all of your math classes..

Mathematics can get pretty complicated. Fortunately, not all math problems need to be inscrutable. Here are five current problems in the field of mathematics that anyone can understand, but nobody has been able to solve.

like...Pick any number. If that number is even, divide it by 2. If it's odd, multiply it by 3 and add 1. Now repeat the process with your new number. If you keep going, you'll eventually end up at 1. Every time.

Mathematicians have tried millions of numbers and they've never found a single one that didn't end up at 1 eventually. The thing is, they've never been able to prove that there isn't a special number out there that never leads to 1. It's possible that there's some really big number that goes to infinity instead, or maybe a number that gets stuck in a loop and never reaches 1. But no one has ever been able to prove that for certain.

So you're moving into your new apartment, and you're trying to bring your sofa. The problem is, the hallway turns and you have to fit your sofa around a corner. If it's a small sofa, that might not be a problem, but a really big sofa is sure to get stuck. If you're a mathematician, you ask yourself: What's the largest sofa you could possibly fit around the corner? It doesn't have to be a rectangular sofa either, it can be any shape.

This is the essence of the moving sofa problem. Here are the specifics: the whole problem is in two dimensions, the corner is a 90-degree angle, and the width of the corridor is 1. What is the largest two-dimensional area that can fit around the corner?

The largest area that can fit around a corner is called—I kid you not—the sofa constant. Nobody knows for sure how big it is, but we have some pretty big sofas that do work, so we know it has to be at least as big as them. We also have some sofas that don't work, so it has to be smaller than those. All together, we know the sofa constant has to be between 2.2195 and 2.8284.

AM I BEING TO MUCH OF A SMART ALECK, I'm sorry if i am LOL.

but if you need help with another question, you can ask me :)

4 0
3 years ago
Evaluate 2^−1 + 2^−1.
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

2^−1 + 2^−1

2x2^-1

1

4 0
3 years ago
Identify the figure that portrays the translation of the given preimage as indicated by the direction arrow.
ladessa [460]

The parallelogram will translate along the arrow and reach the head of the arrow.

The translation is a category of motion in which one body moves along towards a particular direction and reaches a particular point.

In translation, the rotational motion is not present. Also, the translational motion is a one-dimensional motion.

In the given figure, the parallelogram is present at the tail of the arrow.

The arrow depicts the direction of the translational motion.

So, the parallelogram will reach the end of the arrow as shown in the picture present in the attachment.

For more explanation about translation or rotation, refer to the following link:

hhttps://brainly.com/question/9032434

#SPJ10

6 0
2 years ago
A good friend of yours
KATRIN_1 [288]
Sorry i have learnt it but i can remember how to do it

5 0
3 years ago
jay will make $240 doing yard work for 6 weeks. he is saving his money to buy camping equipment that cost $400. He has already s
Jobisdone [24]
No. It take 6wKS to save 240 and he has 120 add 240=360. He short 40 dollars
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Between which Two numbers will you find 5.634 x 10
    9·1 answer
  • The sum of 3 times a number and 4 is between -8 and 10. Define a variable, write an inequality, and solve the problem.
    9·1 answer
  • Please please help!!
    8·1 answer
  • What is the simplified expression for 3a²+9ab+5-4a²-4ab+3 ​
    9·2 answers
  • two families go to a zoo. the smith family of two adults and three chidren pays £61 the jones family of three adults and five ch
    6·2 answers
  • A hiker begins at sea level and descends 25 feet every minute. How long will it take to get to an elevation of -750 feet?
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me!!!!!<br> What are the vales of x and y?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help <br> Question: 6b = 18<br> Answer: ?
    13·2 answers
  • You can also put A. B. C. or D.<br><br>​
    15·1 answer
  • A tax that is collected by a company based on sales of products or services
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!