The plan of USSR was:
TO divide Germany to prevent it from waging war again.
Explanation:
The policy of the USSR was to divide Germany into pieces so that it would never wage wars again. Obviously, that was only the surface reasons given by the soviets.
The true reason was rather self serving.
- The part of the East that Russia eventually got was to serve as the buffer for their territory and Europe.
- They had a foothold in mainland Europe.
- The state was Russian in all but name. They had complete control.
These were the reasons that made Russia come to the conclusion it did.
Explanation: No, this shouldn't be a law because if a theif overcomes you in a fight because you cant use a weapon then he could kill you. The theif is also a criminal not worthy of this life if he wants to steal, so killing him wouldnt be as big of a problem. If the theif runs away with items then using a weapon could stop him.
Right wing authoritarian dictorial power
<u>Which method was more effective in containment? Why?</u>
The Marshall Plan was an example of using financial resources to stop the spread of communism.
Approved by Henry Truman in 1943, the Marshall Plan was a far more effective method in containment because of the following reasons:
- Firstly, it was a subtle method to contain the spread of communism through the USSR disguised as a "plan" to help Western Europe and its decreased economy through loans.
- Secondly, it was a peaceful method that didn't result in devastation as the Korean War.
- Thirdly, it was perceived as a "miracle" and the US gained recognition for their efforts, as well as increasing their own economy.
- Furthermore, through the US' humanitarian efforts it tried to implicitly change the beliefs of the Western European people towards a non-communist political system, for which the Marshall Plan succeeded in the subsequent years.
FDR was angry about the ruling because it ruled the AAA unconstitutional, which was apart of his New Deal Act. I hope that helped, I'm sorry if it didn't.<span />
