Answer:
13.86%
Explanation:
34% was invested into stock X with an expected return of 11%
22% was invested into stock Y with an expected return of 18%
44% was invested into stock Z with an expected return of 14%
The expected return on the portfolio can be calculated using the formula below
Expected return= Sum of ( weight of stock×return of stock)
= (0.34×11%)+(0.22×18%)+(0.44×14%)
= 3.74+3.96+6.16
= 13.86%
Hence the expected return on the portfolio is 13.86%
FOR:
- increased income for workers
- more workers attracted to the workforce
- less strain on federal resources for those in poverty
Against
- more costly for businesses
- possible unemployment due to job automation
- higher prices for consumers.
Here are some basic arguments. You will need to explain these a bit more for your assignment though.
<span>This is the situation or case of real estate dealing in which Agent fred fronts his cousin norm money to buy a client's house. shortly after the closing, agent fred flips the house and realizes a substantial profit. agent fred's actions might be describe as Self-dealing.
Self-dealing is not considered good in real estate. In self-dealing you are interested in your own benefit more than the benefit of clients. There are many methods of dealing are used by agents in real estate field.</span>
Answer: True
Explanation: Hyderali230 is wrong according to Cengage Unlimited. He tries to explain that the principle you keep putting in makes compound interest not grow as quickly. However, It's all things being held equal, meaning, no other principal payments are being made.
Answer:
C. discretionary policies pursue overly expansionary monetary policies to boost employment in the short run but generate higher inflation in the long run.
Explanation:
Arguments for adopting a policy rule include;
- discretionary policies pursue overly expansionary monetary policies to boost employment in the short run but generate higher inflation in the long run.
- discretion enables policymakers to change policy settings when an economy undergoes structural changes.
- discretion avoids the straightjacket that would lock in the wrong policy if the model that was used to derive the policy rule proved to be incorrect.
- policy rules can be too rigid because they cannot foresee every contingency.
- policy rules do not easily incorporate the use of judgment.
